Outdoor Laboratories in Social Studies Learning: A Systematic Review and Pedagogical Implications
Laboratorium Luar Ruang dalam Pembelajaran Ilmu Sosial: Tinjuan Sistematis dan Implikasi Pedagogis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36526/santhet.v10i3.8045Keywords:
outdoor laboratory, outdoor learning,, living laboratory, Social ScienceAbstract
Social science faces the challenge of bridging the gap between theoretical concepts and the dynamics of social reality. Conventional learning models tend to limit learning experiences, making it difficult to understand the complexity of an ever-changing social reality. This study aims to identify forms of outdoor laboratories and learning models that can support the learning process in the social sciences. The research method employed a literature review, with literature searches conducted through Publish or Perish, Consensus, Google Scholar, Gate, and Scopus using the keywords: "outdoor laboratory, outdoor activity, social science laboratory, living laboratory, and outdoor learning. Data analysis used thematic analysis to identify key patterns in the concepts, implementation, and impacts of outdoor laboratory-based learning. The results indicate that outdoor laboratories have been understood as spaces for knowledge production grounded in direct interaction with communities. Suitable learning models include outdoor learning with a design thinking approach and the Living Lab model, which emphasizes social innovation. The use of outdoor laboratories has a positive impact on cognitive aspects by enhancing critical thinking, analytical skills, and problem-solving abilities, as well as on social-emotional aspects by strengthening leadership character and awareness of environmental and local cultural issues. However, its implementation faces challenges related to human resources, infrastructure limitations, and integration with the formal curriculum. This research contributes to the development of a conceptual framework for outdoor laboratories to facilitate more contextual, authentic, and meaningful social science learning.
References
Barfod, K., & Mygind, E. (2022). Udeskole—Regular Teaching Outside the Classroom. In High-Quality Outdoor Learning (pp. 287–297). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04108-2_16
Bentsen, P., Mygind, E., & Randrup, T. B. (2009). Towards an understanding of udeskole : education outside the classroom in a Danish context. Education 3-13, 37(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270802291780
Castillo, A. I. C., & Carrasco, M. B. (2022). The Laboratory As A Tool For Innovation In Social Science Teaching. Human Review. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades, 11. https://doi.org/10.37467/revhuman.v11.3818
Chawla, L. (2022). Childhood Nature Connection and Constructive Hope. In High-Quality Outdoor Learning (pp. 95–122). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04108-2_5
Collier, S. J., Lakoff, A., & Rabinow, P. (2006). What Is A Laboratory In The Human Sciences?
Coppock, A., & Green, D. P. (2015). Assessing the Correspondence between Experimental Results Obtained in the Lab and Field: A Review of Recent Social Science Research. Political Science Research and Methods, 3(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2014.10
Dettweiler, U., Lauterbach, G., Mall, C., & Kermish-Allen, R. (2022). Fostering 21st Century Skills Through Autonomy Supportive Science Education Outside the Classroom. High-Quality Outdoor Learning, 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04108-2_13
Dr. Fahd Naveed Kausar. (2025). Impact of Project-Based and Experiential Learning on Students’ Critical Thinking and Reasoning Skills at the University Level. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 3(2), 2903–2916. https://doi.org/10.59075/jye5xd87
Edwards‐Schachter, M. E., Matti, C. E., & Alcántara, E. (2012). Fostering Quality of Life through Social Innovation: A Living Lab Methodology Study Case. Review of Policy Research, 29(6), 672–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00588.x
Emda, A. (2017). Laboratorium Sebagai Sarana Pembelajaran Kimia Dalam Meningkatkan Pengetahuan Dan Keterampilan Kerja Ilmiah. Lantanida Journal, 2(2), 218. https://doi.org/10.22373/lj.v2i2.1409
Gómez Zermeño, M. G., & Alemán de la Garza, L. Y. (2021). Open laboratories for social innovation: a strategy for research and innovation in education for peace and sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 22(2), 344–362. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-05-2020-0186
Gooday, G. (2008). Placing or Replacing the Laboratory in the History of Science? Isis, 99, 783–798. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/595772
Heinrich, W. F., Habron, G. B., Johnson, H. L., & Goralnik, L. (2015). Critical Thinking Assessment Across Four Sustainability-Related Experiential Learning Settings. Journal of Experiential Education, 38(4), 373–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825915592890
Hobday, R. (2022). Outdoor Learning and Children’s Eyesight. In High-Quality Outdoor Learning (pp. 201–208). Springer Nature.
JABAR, S., FITRISIA, A., & FATIMAH, S. (2024). Peran Filsafat Ilmu Dalam Mengembangkan Metode Penelitian Ilmiah. Cendekia: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan, 4(4), 577–582. https://doi.org/10.51878/cendekia.v4i4.3821
Jayanti, W. E. D. (2017). Pedoman Pengembangan Laboratorium IPS. Pelita, 21(1), 1–12.
Jordan, C., & Chawla, L. (2019). A Coordinated Research Agenda for Nature-Based Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(MAR). https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2019.00766
Juliana, N. (2021). Pemanfaatan Kampung Tanggui Sebagai Laboratorium Outdoor Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial. Https://Doi.Org/10.31219/Osf.Io/4n58z
Kuo, M., Barnes, M., & Jordan, C. (2022). Do Experiences with Nature Promote Learning? Converging Evidence of a Cause-And-Effect Relationship. In High-Quality Outdoor Learning (pp. 47–66). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04108-2_3
Kurniawan, B., Towaf, S. M., Sukamto, Purnomo, A., & Idris. (2021). Outdoor learning based on natural laboratory as social studies learning resources for strengthening students’ insights and characters. In Community Empowerment through Research, Innovation and Open Access (pp. 145–150). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003189206-27
Lausselet, N., & Zosso, I. (2022). Bonding with the World: A Pedagogical Approach. In High-Quality Outdoor Learning (pp. 269–285). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04108-2_15
Mann, J., Gray, T., Truong, S., Brymer, E., Passy, R., Ho, S., Sahlberg, P., Ward, K., Bentsen, P., Curry, C., & Cowper, R. (2022). Getting Out of the Classroom and Into Nature: A Systematic Review of Nature-Specific Outdoor Learning on School Children’s Learning and Development. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.877058
Mauch, J., & Tarman, B. (2016). A Historical Approach to Social Studies Laboratory Method. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.01.02.2
Muhith, A., Afkarina, D., Zahroh, F., Safitri, S. Z., Handayani, U. R., H, S. S. F., Aini, N., Dista, K. S., Inayah, S., Hidayah, A., Hayi, Moh. B., Sanjaya, A., Rahman, Abd., & Puspitasari, A. (2022). Educational Laboratory Management.
Nasar, A., & Kaleka, M. B. U. (2019). Effectiveness of Experimental Laboratory Methods on Understanding the Concept of Light, Science Processes Skills, And Scientific Attitudes of Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 7(3), 262–270. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v7i3.2333
Pamungkas, S. F., Widiastuti, I., & Suharno, S. (2020). 21<sup>st</sup> Century Learning: Experiential Learning to Enhance Critical Thinking in Vocational Education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1345–1355. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080427
Pawlicka-Deger, U. (2020). A Laboratory as the Infrastructure of Engagement: Epistemological Reflections. Open Library of Humanities, 6(2), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.569
Prasetya, S. P., Sarmini, Zain, I. M., Artono, Sadewo, FX. S., & Mahat, H. (2021). Potential of Social Science Outdoor Learning Laboratory in Singgahan District, Tuban. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211223.133
Pratiwi, P. H., Agustina, D., Setya Dhewantoro, H. N., & Disyacitta, F. (2024). Rintisan Laboratorium Literasi Sosial Berbasis Komunitas: Kampus, Sekolah, Masyarakat, Industri. INOTEKS : Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Pengetahuan, Teknologi, Dan Seni, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/ino.v26i2.77140
Sahrina, A., & Deffinika, I. (2021). Potensi Laboratorium Alam Sumbermanjing Wetan dalam pembelajaran Geografi berbasis kerja lapangan (fieldwork). Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi, 26(2), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.17977/um017v26i22021p061
Utari, R. (2017). Penguatan Dan Perluasan Fungsi Laboratorium Pada Rumpun Ilmu Sosial Di Perguruan Tinggi. Dinamika Pendidikan, XXIII(1).
Widiastuti, A. (2020). Konsep Dasar dan Manajemen Laboratorium IPS. UNY Press.
Wirz-Justice, A. (2022). How Daylight Controls the Biological Clock, Organises Sleep, and Enhances Mood and Performance. In High-Quality Outdoor Learning (pp. 191–200). Springer Nature.
Wolf, C., Kunz, P., & Robin, N. (2022). Research and Documentation of Outdoor-Based Teaching in Teacher Education—The EOT Project. High-Quality Outdoor Learning, 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04108-2_14
