Enhancing Reading Comprehension and Review Writing through the One-Book-a-Week Literacy Movement: An Analysis Based on Hans Robert Jauss’s Aesthetic Reception Theory
Penguatan Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman Dan Menulis Resensi Melalui Gerakan Literasi Sepekan 1 Buku: Analisis Berdasarkan Teori Resepsi Estetika Hans Robert Jauss
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36526/santhet.v10i5.7844Keywords:
aesthetic reception, horizon of expectation, Hans Robert Jauss, school literacy, Reading Comprehension, review writingAbstract
This study analyzes the improvement of reading comprehension and review-writing skills through the implementation of the Sepekan 1 Buku Literacy Program at SMP Kristen Petra 2 Surabaya, utilizing Hans Robert Jauss's theory of aesthetic reception. This research is important because most school literacy studies still focus on quantitative aspects and have not deeply examined the process of students' subjective meaning-making as active readers. A descriptive qualitative approach with a reflective-participatory design was employed. Data were collected through participatory observation, analysis of reading journals, documentation of review works, and reflective interviews with 108 seventh-grade students. Thematic analysis was conducted by referring to Jauss's concept of the horizon of expectation, employing three-stage coding (open, axial, and selective) to trace changes in how students interpret texts. The findings indicate that this program successfully: (1) expanded students' horizons of expectation toward reading texts, (2) enhanced critical and reflective thinking skills through review writing, and (3) fostered a sustainable and collaborative literacy culture in the school. These results confirm the relevance of Jauss's theory in school literacy pedagogy, where students act as active subjects constructing meaning through reading and writing experiences. The implications of this study offer a receptive-experience-based literacy learning model that can be adapted by other schools to holistically support literacy quality improvement.
References
Abidin, Y. (2012). Pembelajaran membaca berbasis pendidikan karakter. PT Refika Aditama.
Alvermann, D. E. (2002). Effective literacy instruction for adolescents. Journal of Literacy Research, 34(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3402_4
Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp. 255–291). Longman.
Biesta, G. (2015). What is education for? On good education, teacher judgement, and educational professionalism. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12109
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press.
Comber, B. (2016). Literacy, place, and pedagogies of possibility. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315735650
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Culler, J. (1997). Literary theory: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
Dalman. (2014). Keterampilan membaca. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.
Eagleton, T. (1983). Literary theory: An introduction. Blackwell.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
Faizah, D. U. (2016). Panduan Gerakan Literasi Sekolah. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Harvard University Press.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
García, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385765
Gee, J. P. (2008). Social linguistics and literacies (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139150484
Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–422). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. Edward Arnold.
Holub, R. C. (1984). Reception theory: A critical introduction. Methuen.
Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jauss, H. R. (1982). Toward an aesthetic of reception (T. Bahti, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2016). Panduan Gerakan Literasi Sekolah di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2023). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 23 Tahun 2023 tentang Gerakan Literasi Nasional. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. Oxford University Press.
Krashen, S. (2004). The power of reading (2nd ed.). Heinemann.
Kurniawan, H. (2018). Literasi dalam pembelajaran. Gava Media.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (1999). Further notes on the four resources model. Reading Online. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267785499
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Moje, E. B. (2008). Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(2), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.52.2.1
Nussbaum, M. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton University Press.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
Pressley, M. (2006). Reading instruction that works (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
Rahim, F. (2008). Pengajaran membaca di sekolah dasar. Bumi Aksara.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem. Southern Illinois University Press.
Rusdi, & Husaini, H. H. (2023). Dinamika resepsi terhadap Surah Al-Fil (Analisis teori resepsi Hans Robert Jauss). Jurnal Ilmu Agama, 24(2), 243–258. (Tidak tersedia DOI)
Selden, R., Widdowson, P., & Brooker, P. (2005). A reader's guide to contemporary literary theory (5th ed.). Pearson.
Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/MR1465
Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian pendidikan (Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D). Alfabeta.
Tarigan, H. G. (2008). Membaca sebagai suatu keterampilan berbahasa. Angkasa.
Teeuw, A. (2015). Sastra dan ilmu sastra: Pengantar teori sastra (Edisi revisi). Dunia Pustaka Jaya.
UNESCO. (2017). Literacy for life. UNESCO.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
