Kewenangan Judicial Review oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Implikasinya terhadap Sistem Hukum di Indonesia
Abstract
The Constitutional Court (MK) has important implications for the legal system in Indonesia. The Judicial Review carried out by the Constitutional Court acts as a key mechanism in maintaining the constitutionality of laws, including Government Regulations in Lieu of Laws (PERPPU) and regional regulations. The Constitutional Court has the authority to examine laws against the 1945 Constitution, functioning as a controller and balancer in the exercise of state power. In this research, data will be collected through a literature study which includes legal literature, journal articles and official documents from the Constitutional Court. This research will also involve qualitative analysis of Constitutional Court decisions related to Judicial Review, including their impact on public policy and the protection of constitutional rights. In addition, interviews with legal practitioners, academics and members of the Constitutional Court can be conducted to gain a broader perspective regarding the challenges and successes in implementing the Judicial Review authority. The analytical method used in this research is descriptive and comparative analysis. Descriptive analysis will be used to describe the Constitutional Court's authority in the context of Judicial Review, while comparative analysis will compare the practice of Judicial Review in Indonesia with other countries that have similar legal systems. Research shows that the Constitutional Court's decision, as in several decisions, has a significant impact on the investigation process and the protection of citizens' constitutional rights. The Constitutional Court's authority in resolving election disputes has also received attention, where the Constitutional Court plays a vital role in ensuring justice and transparency in the democratic process. Apart from that, the Constitutional Court is faced with challenges in exercising its authority, including conflicts with other institutions and the need to reorient the Judicial Review authority. The implications of this Judicial Review authority are very broad, including legal and governmental stability. The Constitutional Court's decision not only affects existing regulations, but can also form new legal norms that have the potential to strengthen or weaken the existing legal system. Therefore, it is important to have a deep understanding of the Constitutional Court's authority and its impact on the legal system, as well as the need to strengthen regulations that support the implementation of Judicial Review effectively and efficiently.
References
Aris, T. W. (2020). Urgensi Judicial Review Satu Atap oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. De Jure Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 1(2), 142. https://doi.org/10.33387/dejure.v1i2.1930
Bisariyadi, B. (2018). Distinguishing Constitutional and Statutory Interpretation in Judicial Review Cases: A Blurred Boundary Line. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 18(2), 235. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2018.18.2.1980
Butt, S. (2019). Judicial Reasoning and Review in the Indonesian Supreme Court. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 6(01), 67–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2018.26
Collins, J. S. (2019). Penambahan Kewenangan Constitutional Question di Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Upaya untuk Melindungi Hak-Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara. Jurnal Konstitusi, 15(4), 688. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1541
Darmadi, N. S. (2020). Kedudukan dan Wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Sistem Hukum Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum, 28(2), 1088. https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v28i2.9783
Hasani, I., Halili, H., & Balakrishnan, V. (2022). Undelivered constitutional justice? Study on how the decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia are executed. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 19(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v19i1.48378
Iristian, Y. (2024). Ensuring Administrative Legality and Justice Through Judicial Review in Indonesia. Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research, 2(3), 214–234. https://doi.org/10.62504/jimr390
Kurnia, T. S. (2016). Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Hak Untuk Bebas Dari Perlakuan Diskriminasi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1212
Kushadianto, M. M. B., & Putra, M. D. (2024). Implikasi Hierarki Hukum dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang: Pengaruhnya terhadap Penafsiran dan Penegakan Hukum. Syntax Idea, 6(3), 1476–1484. https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v6i3.3133
Latuheru, P. M., Perdana, F. W., Irwan, I., Setiawan, B., & Sidartha, D. B. (2022). Urgensi Constitusional Question dan Constitusional Complaint, Arti Penting Pemberian Kewenangan Tersebut Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, 3(2), 351–357.
Maulidi, M. A. (2019). Menyoal Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan Final dan Mengikat Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(2), 339. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1627
Nasir, C. (2020). Judicial Review di Amerika Serikat, Jerman, dan Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 8(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.8.1.67-80
Nata, A. R., & Baskoro, M. R. R. (2023). Analisis Dampak Putusan Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Putusan MK Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023. Sanskara Hukum Dan HAM, 2(02), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.58812/shh.v2i02.288
Ningrum, M. P., Roza, A. F., Sari, K., & Hariani, R. R. (2023a). Asas Kepastian Hukum atas Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. Lex Lectio Law Journal, 2(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.61715/jlexlectio.v2i1.28
Ningrum, M. P., Roza, A. F., Sari, K., & Hariani, R. R. (2023b). Asas Kepastian Hukum Atas Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. Lex Lectio Law Journal, 2(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.61715/jlexlectio.v2i1.28
Nining. (2023). Observing the Existence of the Constitutional Court Addresses the Evolving Dynamics and Challenges of the Legal System in Indonesia. Sinergi International Journal of Law, 1(3), 227–234. https://doi.org/10.61194/law.v1i3.100
Pradana, S. A., Mannan, K., Annisa, A. N., & Prayudi, P. (2024). Komodifikasi Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia melalui Ikhtiar Aktivisme Yudisial. Amsir Law Journal, 5(2), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.36746/alj.v5i2.317
Putra. (2022). Sifat Final dan Mengikat Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang. Jurnal Yudisial, 14(3), 291. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v14i3.425
Putra, I. D. G. A. D. (2021). Layout dan Arsitektur Puri, Diantara Politik Kekuasaan dan Identitas Budaya. Pawon: Jurnal Arsitektur, 5(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.36040/pawon.v5i2.3549
Qalsum, U., & Wibowo, A. (2023). Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia Untuk Ajudikasi Hak-Hak Ekonomi, Sosial Dan Budaya Yang Efektif. Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 2(1), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.58705/jpm.v2i1.107
Rishan, I. (2022). Doubting the Impartiality: Constitutional Court Judges and Conflict of Interest. Jurnal Jurisprudence, 12(1), 92–105. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i1.1058
Romadhon, A. H., Sadjijono, S., & Widoyoko, W. D. (2022). Kekuatan Mengikat Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah. Anima Legis, 1(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.55840/al.v1i1.8
Rozi, F. (2023). Polemik Wewenang Mahkamah Konstistusi Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023. Conference on Innovation and Application of Science and Technology (CIASTECH), 6(1), 383. https://doi.org/10.31328/ciastech.v6i1.5284
Rustam, R., Marlina, T., & Handoko, D. (2022). Sejarah Pembentukan dan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. JURNAL DIMENSI, 11(2), 270–281. https://doi.org/10.33373/dms.v11i2.3973
Sa’adah, N. (2019). Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Pengawal Demokrasi dan Konstitusi Khususnya dalam Menjalankan Constitutional Review. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 2(2), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i2.235-247
Saputra, P., Asnawi, E., & Azmi, B. (2024). Menakar Kekuatan Mengikat Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Perspektif Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. South East Asia Law Aspect, 1(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.61761/seala.1.1.21-27
Saputro, J. D., Sinaulan, R. L., & Suganda, A. (2022). Implikasi dan Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/Puu-Xviii/2020 Terhadap Proses Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-i, 9(6), 1905–1918. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v9i6.28924
Satria, R., Fitriani, R. A., Astono, A., & Purwanto. (2022). Analisis Yuridis terhadap Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Kaitannya dengan Proses Penyidikan : Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor : 130/PUU-XIII/2015. Arus Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 2(2), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.57250/ajsh.v2i2.67
Satriawan, I., & Lailam, T. (2019). Open Legal Policy dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Pembentukan Undang-Undang. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(3), 559. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1636
Satrio, A. (2018). Constitutional Retrogression in Indonesia Under President Joko Widodo’s Government: What Can the Constitutional Court Do? Constitutional Review, 4(2), 271. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev425
Siahaan, M. (2021). Integrasi Konstitusional Kewenangan Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Agung. Jurnal Konstitusi, 17(4), 729–752. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1742
Silalahi, W. (2023). Pemberlakuan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi pada Saat Tahapan Pemilu Berlangsung. Jurnal Bawaslu Provinsi Kepulauan Riau, 5(01), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.55108/jbk.v5i01.291
Simamora, J. (2014). Analisa Yuridis terhadap Model Kewenangan Judicial Review di Indonesia. Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 25(3), 388. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16079
Suhariyanto, B. (2016). Masalah Eksekutabilitas Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi oleh Mahkamah Agung. Jurnal Konstitusi, 13(1), 171. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1318
Sujono, I. (2022). Urgensi Penemuan Hukum dan Penggunaan Yurisprudensi dalam Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(3), 585. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1835
Tambunan, E. M., Sembiring, R. E. B., Gozali, F., & Sianturi, D. M. R. (2024). Analisis Eksistensi Etika Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Mewujudkan Peradilan Berintegritas dan Akuntabel (Putusan MK No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023). IBLAM LAW REVIEW, 4(2), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v4i2.406
Wicaksono, I., & Nugroho, R. M. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Sebagai Tindak Lanjut Atas Putusan Pengujian Undang-Undang Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. Ahmad Dahlan Legal Perspective, 1(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.12928/adlp.v1i1.4092
Wijaya, M. H., Subawa, I. M., Palguna, I. D. G., Astariyani, N. L. G., & Sumadi, I. P. S. (2024). Legal Morality of Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Based on Pancasila. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(9), 4121–4136. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v3i9.10863
Yandy, E. T., Tauvani, A. Y., Sulaeman, S., Yusuf, M., & Isa, M. (2024). The Principle of Checks and Balances in Islamic State Administration Studies. Jurnal Mediasas: Media Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah, 7(1), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.58824/mediasas.v7i1.118
