The Legal Ideal of Pancasila in the Perspective of Postmodernism
Abstract
The legal ideal of Pancasila, as the foundation of the Indonesian state, has long been regarded as a stable and universal ideology. However, with the development of postmodern thought, which emphasizes relativism, pluralism, and the deconstruction of grand narratives, the relevance of Pancasila's legal ideal within the postmodern context requires further exploration. This study aims to examine whether Pancasila's legal ideal remains relevant from a postmodern perspective and how postmodernism may influence the application of Pancasila's legal principles in Indonesia. This research uses a normative method with a philosophical approach, which is prescriptive in nature, to explore postmodern thoughts related to law, ideology, and the state. The analysis technique used is deductive, starting from postmodern theories and applying them to the context of Pancasila law. The findings suggest that, from a postmodern perspective, the legal ideal of Pancasila should not be seen as a rigid and singular legal system. Instead, Pancasila can be understood as a flexible principle, open to change, and accommodating diverse viewpoints within Indonesia's pluralistic society. However, a deeper understanding is required on how the values of Pancasila can be dynamically interpreted, in line with the demands of the times and the challenges of globalization faced by Indonesia. This study concludes that Pancasila's legal ideal remains relevant, but must be adapted to the ongoing social and cultural developments
References
Alves da Silva, F. (2022). The End of Law: Carl Schmitt in the Twenty-First Century. Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN), 29(60). https://doi.org/10.21680/1983-2109.2022v29n60id30863
Fansuri, H. (2012). Globalisasi, postmodernisme dan tantangan kekinian sosiologi indonesia. Jurnal Sosiologi Islam, 2(1).
Harahap, M. S. (2013). Pancasila Dalam Konteks Postmodern. Jurnal Mitra Manajemen, 5(2).
Hariri, A. (2019). Dekonstruksi Ideologi Pancasila sebagai Bentuk Sistem Hukum di Indonesia. Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v3i1.1055
Hidayat, M. A. (2019a). Menimbang Teori-Teori Sosial Postmodern. Journal of Urban Sosiology, 2(1).
Hidayat, M. A. (2019b). MENIMBANG TEORI-TEORI SOSIAL POSTMODERN: SEJARAH, PEMIKIRAN, KRITIK DAN MASA DEPAN POSTMODERNISME. Journal of Urban Sociology, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.30742/jus.v2i1.610
Lonto, A. L., & Pangalila, T. (2019). The existence of Pancasila Values in the Disrupted Era. https://doi.org/10.2991/icesshum-19.2019.23
Ryle, G. (1970). Martin heidegger: “Sein und Zeit.” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.1970.11006133
Sari, N. Y. (2021). Pancasila Sebagai Dasar dan Ideologi Bangsa (Pentingnya Rumusan Butir-Butir Pancasila Sebagai Dasar Pendidikan Moral dan Pemersatu Keberagaman Bangsa Indonesia). Tarbawi Ngabar: Jurnal of Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.55380/tarbawi.v2i1.93
Septian, R. N., & Dewi, D. A. (2021). Revitalisasi Nilai Luhur Pancasila Sebagai Resonansi Kebangsaan Di Tengah Derasnya Arus Globalisasi. EduPsyCouns Jouurnal, 3(1).
Smith, G. (2020). No longer ‘speaking truth to power.’ Practical Theology, 13(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1080/1756073X.2020.1738674
Sugianto, F., Michael, T., & Mahatta, A. (2021). Konstelasi Perkembangan Hermeneutika dalam Filsafat Ilmu sebagai Atribusi Metode Penafsiran Hukum. Negara Hukum, 12(21).
Widiatama, W., Mahmud, H., & Suparwi, S. (2020). IDEOLOGI PANCASILA SEBAGAI DASAR MEMBANGUN NEGARA HUKUM INDONESIA. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v3i2.2774
