Pola Ketergantungan Pariwisata di Taman Nasional Komodo
Abstract
The designation of Komodo National Park as a super priority destination, the zoning policy and the discourse of closing the area have limited the access of people living in the National Park area. The community's main livelihood as fishermen is limited to certain zones. This qualitative research uses qualitative data collection techniques, namely (1) Participant observation (2) In-depth interviews; (3) Document study. This research uses the snowball sampling method in determining informants. The results show that changes in environmental management are not only limited to changing the environment, but also forming new subjects in the community. The main livelihood of the community as fishermen is limited to certain zones, slowly fishermen's livelihoods are uncertain results, making people switch livelihoods to the tourism sector. The high standard of tourism sometimes makes some local tourism actors unable to keep up, resulting in dependence on capital and human resources from developed country investors. The low bargaining position of the community occurs due to the monopoly of the tourism business from investors.
References
Frank, Andre Gunder. (1984). Sosiologi Pembangunan dan Keterbelakangan Sosiologi Pustaka. ]akarta: Pulsar.
Gunawan, M. P. (1994). Pengembangan Pariwisata Internasional di Indonesia Dalam Konteks Teori Ketergantungan. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 5(16a), 4-13.
Hills, J. (1994). Dependency theory and its relevance today: international institutions in telecommunications and structural power. Review of International Studies, 20(2), 169-186.
https://www.kompasiana.com/yudhaheka/5510820f8133115a3bbc6496/taman-nasional-komodo-resmi-menjadi-the-new-seven-wonders-of-nature
Ikhsan, M. (2017). Multiplier Effect Industri Pariwisata Candi Muara Takus Terhadap Perekonomian Masyarakat Di Kecamatan Xii Koto Kampar Kabupaten Kampar. JOM Fekon, 4(1), 689–700.
Karim, A. (2017). Pariwisata dan Kekuasaan: Sebuah Telaah Foucauldian. Jurnal Kajian Ruang Sosial-Budaya, 1(1), 81-105.
Lee, D., Hampton, M., & Jeyacheya, J. (2015). The political economy of precarious work in the turism industry in small island developing states. Review of International Political Economy, 22(1), 194-223.
Miswanto, M., & Safaat, M. (2018). Dampak Pembangunan Industri Pariwisata terhadap Alih Fungsi Lahan. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya, 20(1), 45-55.
Moleong, L. (2010). Metode peneltian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Nomor P.8/MENLHK/SETJEN/KUM.1/3/2019
Rajapakse, C. R. (2016). The relationship between foreign direct investment and tourism development: evidence from Sri Lanka. International Journal of Research in Economics and Social Sciences, 6(5), 183-193.
Spradley, J. (1980). Participant Observation” Holt, Rineart and WinSton, Inc. New York.
Streimikiene, D., Svagzdiene, B., Jasinskas, E., & Simanavicius, A. (2021). Sustainable tourism development and competitiveness: The systematic literature review. Sustainable development, 29(1), 259-271.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kepariwisataan
UU 8/2003, Pembentukan Kabupaten Manggarai Barat Di Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur
Yakub, Anggita Permata. (2019). Pengaruh Sektor Pariwisata Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Di Indonesia. Tesis. Universitas Airlangga Surabaya