THE ASSESMENT OF HISTORY LEARNING IN IMPLEMENTATION OF KURIKULUM MERDEKA
Abstract
History learning includes three activities, namely planning, implementation and assessment. However, history teachers tend to be more concerned with planning and implementation, while the assessment aspect is considered less important. In the Kurikulum Merdeka, assessment is an activity that is as important as learning, even the official guidelines are entitled "Learning and Assessment Guidelines". This article aims to analyze how history learning is assessed in the implementation of the independent curriculum. The method used is literature study, namely analyzing books, articles, guidelines and regulations related to assessment and the Kurikulum Merdeka. Assessment in the Kurikulum Merdeka uses formative and summative assessments. Formative assessments are carried out at the beginning and middle of learning, while summative assessments are carried out at the end of learning. The purpose of formative assessment is to improve the quality of learning, while summative determines the student's final grade. History learning in the Kurikulum Merdeka has several strands or skills which are also elements of learning outcomes. In preparing a history learning assessment, the teacher first determines the skills/strands and learning objectives, then decides on the form and technique of the relevant instruments. Determination of assessments needs to look at student characteristics so that student-centered learning can truly be implemented. Forms of instruments that can be used other than multiple choice are open questions, essay writing, and projects or investigations. The instrument technique can use checklist guidelines, point systems, and assessment rubrics
References
Anggraena, Y., Ginanto, D., Felicia, N., & Andiarti, A. (2022). Panduan Pembelajaran dan Asesmen Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Pendidikan Dasar, dan Menengah. In Badan Standar, Kurikulum, Dan Asesmen Pendidikan. Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi RI.
BSKAP. (2022). Capaian Pembelajaran Mata Pelajaran Sejarah Fase E-Fase F Untuk SMA/MA/Program Paket C. Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi RI. https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/033_H_KR_2022-Salinan-SK-Kabadan-tentang-Perubahan-SK-008-tentang-Capaian-Pembelajaran.pdf
Drake, F. D., & McBride, L. W. (1997). Reinvigorating the Teaching of History through Alternative Assessment. The History Teacher, 30(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.2307/494571
Edmunds, J. (2006). How to Assess Student Performance in History: Going beyond Multiple-Choice Tests. Third Edition. Service Center at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED513873.pdf
Fitrianingsih, R., Umamah, N., & Na’im, M. (2015). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar Sejarah Peserta Didik Kelas X SOS 2 di SMAN 4 Jember Tahun Ajaran 2014 / 2015 ( Application of Project Based Learning Model to Improve Critical Thi. Jurnal Edukasi UNEJ, 2(1), 32–36. http://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JEUJ/article/view/3511
Kartowagiran, B., & Jaedun, A. (2016). Model Asesmen Autentik Untuk Menilai Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP): Implementasi Asesmen Autentik di SMP. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.10063
Martha, Y., Sa’diyah, D., Maulana, H., & Warto, W. (2023). Konsep Dasar Sejarah: Implementasinya Dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Bhineka Tunggak Ika, 1(4), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.51903/bersatu.v1i4.285
Munazar, T. H., & Qomarudin, A. (2021). Pengembangan Teknik Dan Instrumen Asesmen Aspek Pengetahuan Berbasis Tekhnologi. Bintang: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sains, 3(1), 34–59. https://doi.org/10.30863/attadib.v2i1.1247
Mutawally, A. F. (2021). Pengembangan Model Project Based Learning Dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 1–6. https://osf.io/xyhve/
Nur Budiono, A., & Hatip, M. (2023). Asesmen Pembelajaran Pada Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Axioma : Jurnal Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, 8(1), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.56013/axi.v8i1.2044
Putri Sayekti, S., & Al-Hamidiyah Jakarta, S. (2022). “Menyongsong Kurikulum Merdeka Dalam Mewujudkan Profil Pelajar Pancasila” Systematic Literature Review: Pengembangan Asesmen Pembelajaran Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Tingkat Sekolah Dasar Systematic Literatur Review: Development Of Learning Asessment For In. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 2, 23–28.
Rahmawati, F. D., Sutiyah, S., & Abidin, N. F. (2022). Implementasi Pembelajaran Sejarah dalam Kurikulum Merdeka Kelas X di SMA Penggerak Surakarta. Jurnal Candi, 22(1), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.21831/istoria.v11i2.7555
Sudirtha, I. G. (2022). Asesmen Pembelajaran Paradigma Baru di Era Merdeka Belajar.
Widiadi, A. N., Aji Saputra, M. R., & Handoyo, I. C. (2022). Merdeka Berpikir Sejarah: Alternatif Strategi Implementasi Keterampilan Berpikir Sejarah Dalam Penerapan Kurikulum Merdeka. Sejarah Dan Budaya: Jurnal Sejarah, Budaya, Dan Pengajarannya, 16(1), 235. https://doi.org/10.17977/um020v16i12022p235-247
Wikarya, Y., Maidarman, M., & Eswendi, E. (2018). Pengembangan Dan Penerapan Asesmen Alternatif Bagi Guru Sekolah Dasar. Gorga : Jurnal Seni Rupa, 7(2), 225. https://doi.org/10.24114/gr.v7i2.11527
Zed, M. (2004). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=zG9sDAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=id#v=onepage&q&f=false