The article Social Criticism[ in the short story of Orang Gila Yang Bijak Dan Merdeka by Jefta H. Atapeni.

Kritik Sosial Dalam Cerpen Orang Gila Yang Bijak Dan Merdeka Karya Jefta H. Atapeni

  • I'm ester Baksuni Undana Kupang
  • Hayon G. Nico Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Margaretha P.E Djokaho Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Karolus B. Jama Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Nusa Cendana
Keywords: Social Criticism, Short Story, Domination, Hegemony.

Abstract

This study raises about the social criticism contained in the short story Orang Gila Yang Bijak dan Merdeka by Jefta H. Atapeni. The problem raised in this study is social criticism and the form of delivery of social criticism in the short story of Orang Gila Yang Bijak dan Merdeka by Jefta H. Atapeni. This study aims to describe social criticism and the form of delivery of social criticism in the short story Orang Gila Yang Bijak dan Merdeka by Jefta H. Atapeni. This study uses Antonio Gramsci's theory of Domination and Hegemony. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative research method. The source of the data in this research is the short story of Orang Gila Yang Bijak dan Merdeka by Jefta H. Atapeni. The results of this study are: 1) The most dominant social criticism discussed is socio-economic criticism, while the dominant form of criticism that appears is a symbolic and simple form of criticism. 2) Social criticism includes, social criticism of political, economic, cultural, religious, morality, gender, power, and government issues. 3) The forms of delivery of criticism include direct criticism, namely in a straightforward manner, indirect forms, namely, symbolically, subtly, and cynically. The results of this study are expected to be useful for broadening the horizons of appreciation of literary readers for social criticism in literary works in the form of short stories and its application with Antonio Gramsci's theory of Domination and Hegemony. The results of this study are also expected to be used as reference material and as a reference or comparison material for literary researchers in the future.

References

Anwar, Anwar. 2010. Teori sosiologi Sastra. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.
Atapeni, Jefta H. 2016. Percakapan Dengan Laut Kumpulan Cerpen. Yogyakarta: Framepublising
Eddyono, Aryo S. 2020. Jurnalisme Warga, Hegemoni, & Rusaknya Keragaman Informasi. Jakarta: Universitas Bakrie Press.
Harjito. 2014. Hegemoni Gramsci Dalam Sastra Indonesi: Student Hijo, Nasionalisme, Dan Wacana. Upgris Press.
KBBI, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia: Depdiknas.2009.
Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. 2015. Teori pengkajian Fiksi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Retnasih, Anisa Octafinda. 2014. Kritik sosial dalam roman Momo karya Michael Ende (Analisis sosiologi sastra).
Sari, Nita Kartika. 2017. Hegemoni Kekuasaan Pemangku Adat Minangkabau Dalam Novel Tenggelamnya Kapal Van Der Wijck Karya Hamka (Kajian Hegemoni Gramsci). Universitas Negeri Semarang. (Skripsi).
Satrio, Benny Setiawan, dkk 2014. Kritik Sosial dan Hegemoni kumpulan cerpen emak ingin naik haji karya Asma Nadia (jurnal). Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Sanu, Maya S.N. 2021. Kritik Sosial Dalam Novel Cantik Itu Luka Karya Eka Kurniawan. Universitas Nusa Cendana. Kupang. (Skripsi).
Simon, Roger. 2004. Gagasan-gagasan Politik Gramsci. Yogyakarta: Insist & Pustaka Pelajar.
Tribuana, Brigitta Gangga. 2019. Dominasi, Hegemoni, Dan Kekuasaan Dalam Serat Rangsang Tuban Ki Padmasusastra. Universitas Sanata Dharma. Yogyakarta. (Skripsi).
Published
2022-10-31
How to Cite
Baksuni, I. ester, Hayon G. Nico, Margaretha P.E Djokaho, & Karolus B. Jama. (2022). The article Social Criticism[ in the short story of Orang Gila Yang Bijak Dan Merdeka by Jefta H. Atapeni.: Kritik Sosial Dalam Cerpen Orang Gila Yang Bijak Dan Merdeka Karya Jefta H. Atapeni. Santhet: (Jurnal Sejarah, Pendidikan, Dan Humaniora), 6(2), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.36526/santhet.v6i2.2196