THE URGENCY OF FORMING AUCTION LAW TO SUPPORT LEGAL CERTAINTY FOR AUCTION OFFICIALS THROUGH ONLINE AUCTIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i2.8475Keywords:
Legal Certainty, Auction Officials, Online AuctionsAbstract
Analyzing the regulatory urgency and determining the composition of technology-adaptive material content constitute the objectives of this research. The study applies a normative juridical method, supported by a statutory and conceptual framework. The research results show that: 1) The establishment of a national Auction Law is urgently needed to address the dualism of regulations. Currently, the main basis for auctions is the Vendu Reglement, a Dutch colonial legacy regulation that regulates general sales procedures and has been in effect since April 1, 1908. Hierarchically, the Vendu Reglement has the same status as a Law based on the Transitional Provisions of the 1945 Constitution. Conflicts arise because online auction procedures are only regulated at the level of the Minister of Finance Regulation, which is hierarchically lower, so that based on the principle of Lex superior derogat legi inferiori, the regulation is vulnerable to being revoked because it is considered to deviate from the physical obligations in the Vendu Reglement. 2) National codification is needed as a basis for legal certainty and protection for Auction Officials. The formulation of the material must include a redefinition of “reading” minutes digitally, the legality of electronic signatures that are equivalent to authentic deeds, and limitations on officials’ responsibility for electronic system failures.
References
Adjie, H. (2013). Menjalin Pemikiran – Pendapat Tentang Kenotariatan (Kumpulan Tulisan). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Amini, S. (2022). Pentingnya Pendaftaran Tanah: Perspektif Teori Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Dan Kenotariatan, 6(3), 1347–1361. https://doi.org/10.33474/hukeno.v6i3.17712
Berry, M. F. (2021). Pembentukan Teori Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Muhammadiyah Law Review, 2(2), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.24127/lr.v2i2.1461
Bhismananda, I. M. B., & Purwanto, I. W. N. (2024). Regulation of Patent Rights as an Object of Fiduciary Guarantee. POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES, 3(3), 425–429. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v3i3.1375
Fuady, M. (2013). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Pendekatan Kontemporer). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Gumilang, M. R. (2020). “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pejabat Lelang,” DJKN Kemenkeu. Djkn.Kemenkeu.Go.Id. https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/kpknl-jakarta3/baca-artikel/13633/Perlindungan-Hukum-Bagi-Pejabat-Lelang.html
Huda, M. (2020). Hak atas memperoleh kepastian hukum dalam perspektif persaingan usaha melalui telaah bukti tidak langsung. Jurnal Ham, 11(2), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2020.11.255-267
Ibrahim, J. (2006). Teori dan metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. In Malang: Bayumedia Publishing (Vol. 57).
Irfani, N. (2020). Asas Lex Superior, Lex Specialis, dan Lex Posterior: Pemaknaan, Problematika, dan Penggunaannya dalam Penalaran dan Argumentasi Hukum. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 16(3), 305–325. https://www.academia.edu/download/75194426/pdf.pdf
Karina, A. S. (2019). Keabsahan Akta Risalah Lelang Sebagai Akta Otentik Dalam Pelaksanaan Lelang Elektronik Oleh Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara Dan Lelang (KPKNL). Universitas Brawijaya.
Kementerian Keuangan (DJKN). (2022). Asas lex superior derogate legi inferiori dan Kedudukan Surat Edaran dalam Perundang-undangan. Artikel KPKNL Kisaran. https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/kpknl-kisaran/baca-artikel/15099/Asas-lex-superior-derogate-legi-inferiori-dan-Kedudukan-Surat-Edaran-dalam-Perundang-undangan.html
Kie, T. T. (1987). Serba Serbi Ilmu Kenotariatan. In Alumni, Bandung.
Liono, C. E. F., Malombeke, E., Thariqi, M. R., & Dida, D. F. M. D. (2023). Perkembangan Penyelenggaraan Lelang Non Eksekusi Oleh Pejabat Lelang Kelas 2 (Notaris) Dimasa Pandemi Covid-19. UNES Law Review, 5(4), 4039–4054. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.712
Mafita, M. (2020). Pelaksanaan Lelang Melalui Internet Terhadap Aset Barang Milik Negara Pada Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang Serang Berdasarkan Asas Kepastian Hukum. Nurani Hukum, 2(2), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.51825/nhk.v2i2.8560
Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media, 55.
Muhaimin, S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram University Press. Mataram.
Mukti Fajar, N. D., & Achmad, Y. (2010). Dualisme penelitian hukum: normatif & empiris. Pustaka pelajar.
Pulumoduyo, A. (2023). Perlindungan hukum terhadap peserta lelang online di media sosial instagram. JURNAL RELASI PUBLIK: Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Katolik Widya Karya Malang, 2(1), 104–114. https://doi.org/10.59581/jrp-widyakarya.v2i1.2100
Rachmadi, U. (2016). Hukum Lelang. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Rafika, A., Mahendra, R. I., & Adonara, F. F. (2024). Urgensi Pembentukan Undang-Undang Tentang Lelang. Jurnal Kajian Riset Multisiplin, 8(6), 38–48. https://oaj.jurnalhst.com/index.php/jkrm/article/view/2015
Ridwan, H. (2018). Hukum Administrasi Negara, Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Salim, H. (2015). Teknik Pembuatan Akta Satu (Konsep teoritis, Kewenangan Notaris, bentuk dan Minuta Akta). Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sari, W., & Romlaini, S. (2025). Mekanisme Permohonan Lelang Online (E-Auction) pada Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang Jember. Menulis: Jurnal Penelitian Nusantara, 1(3), 247–253. https://doi.org/10.59435/menulis.v1i3.102
Simanjuntak. (2023). Hukum Lelang Di Indonesia. Prenada Media.
Soeprapto, M. F. I. (2020). Ilmu Perundang-Undangan: Jenis, Fungsi, dan Materi Muatan. Kanisius, Yogyakarta.
Yasin, M. (2019). RUU Pelelangan, Upaya Mengubah Vendu Reglement Warisan Belanda. Hukum Online.Com. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/ruu-pelelangan--upaya-mengubah-ivendu-reglement-i-warisan-belanda-lt5c9caae759a30/
.png)
