APPLICATION OF CRIMINAL SANCTIONS IN LAW NUMBER 41 OF 2014 CONCERNING ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND HEALTH (STUDY AT THE DELI SERDANG REGENCY AGRICULTURE OFFICE)

Authors

  • Tukijo Tukijo Magister Ilmu Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Medan Area
  • Isnaini Isnaini Magister Ilmu Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Medan Area
  • Andi Hakim Lubis Magister Ilmu Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Medan Area

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i1.7372

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the application of criminal sanctions in Law Number 41 of 2014, which plays a crucial role in supporting national food security in the livestock and animal health sector. This law stipulates strict criminal sanctions for violations such as animal abuse, the slaughter of productive fe males, and the distribution of illegal animal products. However, its implementation in Deli Serdang Regency still faces obstacles, such as weak law enforcement, limited resources, and low public awareness. Based on these issues, the research questions are formulated as follows: First, are the criminal sanctions stipulated in Law Number 41 of 2014 effective in preventing violations in the animal health sector? Second, how are the criminal sanctions in Law Number 41 of 2014 concerning Livestock and Animal Health applied to violations in the livestock sector?  And Third, what are the obstacles faced in the implementation of criminal sanctions in Law Number 41 of 2014, both in terms of law enforcement and socio-economic aspects of society? The method used in this study is empirical juridical with observation data collection, interviews and document studies, while data analysis uses descriptive analysis. This study found that although normatively Law No. 41/2014 regulates strict criminal sanctions (for example, Articles 86 and 87), its effectiveness in preventing violations in the field of animal health is not optimal. The application of criminal sanctions for violations in the livestock sector (for example, cultivation without a permit, use of non-standard feed, illegal slaughter) is also not consistent, often hampered by the complexity of technical and scientific evidence, as well as the tendency for case resolution to end in coaching or administrative sanctions. The main obstacles faced include the difficulty of proving technical criminal elements, limited human resource capacity (HR) of law enforcement officers in understanding aspects of livestock and animal health, lack of coordination between institutions, and limited facilities and infrastructure (for example, testing laboratories).  From a socio-economic perspective, obstacles arise from low legal understanding and awareness among livestock businesses, particularly small-scale ones, as well as economic pressures that encourage them to ignore standards for the sake of profit.

References

Bani, P. P. P., Pello, J., & Leo, R. P. (2025). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Peraturan Daerah Kota Kupang Nomor 10 Tahun 2007 Tentang Retribusi Izin Usaha Pemeliharaan Ternak terhadap Peternakan. Artemis Law Journal, 3(1), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.35508/alj.v3i1.22114

Efendi, I., & Mubarak, R. (2025). Analisis Penerapan Sanksi Pidana terhadap Tindak Pidana Perburuan Satwa Liar di Kawasan Taman Nasional Gunung Leuser : (Studi Putusan Nomor 327/Pid.B/LH/2023/Pn Stb). Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 4(6), 392–402. https://doi.org/10.56128/LJOALR.V4I6.563

Fahmiron, & Wansri, E. (2024). Penerapan Unsur Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Satwa Liar yang Dilindungi Pada Tahap Penyidikan di Satreskrim Polres Solok Kota. Ekasakti Legal Science Journal, 1(3), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.60034/4prqjg79

Gusfira, N., & Irawan, A. (2023). Penanggulangan Kejahatan Perkarantinan Pertanian dan Hewan diwilayah Perbatasan Indonesia dan Malaysia, Kalimantan Utara. Mubeza, 13(2), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.54604/MBZ.V13I2.358

Kevin, Y., Fathonah, R., & Cemerlang, A. M. (2025). Penerapan Rehabilitasi dan Pengawasan terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Seksual Berhubungan dengan Hewan: Studi Kasus Polres Tasikmalaya. Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik, 2(2), 1215–1221. https://doi.org/10.62379/R8Q9AF41

Khalida, A., Hidayat, T., Amrizal, A., & Irham, M. (2025). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Adat Pasca Penerapan KUHP Nasional. Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities, 122–130. https://conferenceproceedings.ump.ac.id/pssh/article/view/1834

Mailangkay, A. E. (2024). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Kelalaian atas Memasang Perangkap untuk Menangkap atau Membunuh Binatang Buas Tanpa Izin. LEX ADMINISTRATUM, 12(4), 1–12. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/administratum/article/view/55749

Makarawung, J. R. (2025). Kajian Hukum atas Penganiayaan Hewan Berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. LEX PRIVATUM, 16(1), 1–8. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/62019

Manuk, W. S., Medan, K. K., & Pello, J. (2024). Penerapan Sanksi Hukum Adat Ukun Badu terhadap Pelaku Pencurian Kayu di Hutan Lindung Desa Sikun Kecamatan Malaka Barat Kabupaten Malaka. Artemis Law Journal, 1(2), 642–652. https://doi.org/10.35508/alj.v1i2.15393

Nurwanti, Y. D., Nugraha, A., & Rahmansah, H. (2024). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 41 Tahun 2014 tentang Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan. Jurnal Fakta Hukum, 3(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.58819/jfh.v3i1.127

Pakaja, R., Imran, S. Y., & Muhtar, M. H. (2024). Kajian Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Tindak Pidana Pengangkutan Satwa Dilindungi (Studi pada Putusan PN Gorontalo NO. 72/PID.B/LH/2023/PN GTO. SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 1(5), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.62335/3j9d5q48

Prasetyo, F. A., Sepud, I. M., & Widyantara, I. M. M. (2024). Sanksi Pidana terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Hewan. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 5(3), 276–280. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.5.3.2023.276-280

Sendi, F. N., & Idham, I. (2023). Upaya Kepolisian dalam Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Pencurian Hewan Ternak Sapi (Studi Kasus di Wilayah Polsek Kabupaten Pringsewu). Audi Et AP : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 2(2), 100–117. https://doi.org/10.24967/jaeap.v2i02.2354

Seregig, I. K., & Siwi, D. R. (2025). Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Penggelapan Hewan dalam Putusan No. 1040/Pid.B/2023/Pn.Tjk. Journal of Economic and Management (JEM) Terekam Jejak, 2(2), 1–9. https://journal.terekamjejak.com/index.php/jem/article/view/350

Siregar, A. G. (2023). Implementasi Asas Ultimum Remedium terhadap Penerapan Sanksi Pidana dalam Undang-Undang Administratif. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(4), 10271–10285. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/3979

Suja, I. W., & Sadnyini, I. A. (2023). Penegakan Hukum Pidana terhadap Penyelundupan Satwa yang Dilindungi. UNES Law Review, 6(2), 1–8. https://www.review-unes.com/index.php/law/article/view/1561

Sukmawan, Y. A., & Damayanti, D. (2025). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris sebagai Strategi Penguatan Perspektif Kajian Ilmu Hukum. Notary Law Journal, 4(3), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.32801/NOLAJ.V4I3.116

Tashenda, T., & Sukmareni, S. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Bagi Pelaku Penganiayaan terhadap Hewan Peliharaan dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(5), 8688–8701. https://doi.org/10.31004/INNOVATIVE.V4I5.14637

Utama, I. K. C. M., Dharma, I. B. W., Pratiwi, I. A. W. K., & Pitriyantini, P. E. (2024). Peran Polda Bali dalam Melindungi Kedaulatan Pangan dan Kesehatan Hewan Melalui Penegakan Hukum Karantina. Jurnal Sutasoma, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.58878/sutasoma.v3i1.361

Verlina, & Kornelis, Y. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Tindak Kekerasan pada Hewan: Kajian Hukum Perspektif Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Supremasi, 13(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v13i1.2081

Downloads

Published

2026-02-12

How to Cite

Tukijo, T., Isnaini, I., & Lubis, A. H. (2026). APPLICATION OF CRIMINAL SANCTIONS IN LAW NUMBER 41 OF 2014 CONCERNING ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND HEALTH (STUDY AT THE DELI SERDANG REGENCY AGRICULTURE OFFICE). SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL, 15(1), 639–646. https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i1.7372