THE PROCESS OF SOCIAL EXCHANGE IN MARRIAGE WITHIN THE FANAN CUSTOMARY GROUP IN THE ARU ISLANDS

Rahel Adriana Gainaugasiray; Tonny Donald Pariela; Simona Christina Henderika Litaay; Jeffry EM Leiwakabessy

doi:10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i2.7352

Authors

Rahel Adriana Gainaugasiray Master Program in Sociology, Graduate School, Pattimura University, Ambon, Indonesia
Tonny Donald Pariela Master Program in Sociology, Graduate School, Pattimura University, Ambon, Indonesia
Simona Christina Henderika Litaay Master Program in Sociology, Graduate School, Pattimura University, Ambon, Indonesia
Jeffry EM Leiwakabessy Master Program in Sociology, Graduate School, Pattimura University, Ambon, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i2.7352

Keywords:

Fanan marriage; Odar Serol; Bridewealth; social cohesion;

Abstract

This study examines the traditional marriage practices of the Fanan community in the Aru Islands, focusing on the Odar Serol ceremony as a form of honorable marriage. The research employs qualitative methods, including ethnographic observation, interviews with community members, and documentation of customary rituals. The findings reveal that Fanan marriage encompasses multiple dimensions: economic, symbolic, kinship, moral-social, and cultural transmission. Bridewealth serves not only as material provision but also as a moral and symbolic medium to reinforce family alliances, social obligations, and respect for cultural norms. Kinship networks formed through marriage strengthen solidarity, cooperation, and social cohesion within the community. Traditional leaders and family members play essential roles in mediating exchanges, ensuring compliance with customary rules, and maintaining the integrity of the marriage process. The study concludes that Fanan marriage functions as both a social institution and a mechanism for preserving cultural heritage, transmitting values intergenerationally, and sustaining communal harmony. Overall, the Odar Serol ceremony illustrates how marriage rituals integrate symbolic meaning, moral responsibility, and structured social exchange to reinforce collective identity and maintain societal equilibrium.

References

Abdou, A. H., Hassan, T. H., Salem, A. E., Albakhit, A. I., Almakhayitah, M. Y., & Salama, W. (2022). The nexus between environmentally sustainable practices, green satisfaction, and customer citizenship behavior in eco-friendly hotels: social exchange theory perspective. Sustainability, 14(19), 12791.

Afunugo, K. N. (2025). Rethinking the Christian vow of matrimonial indissolubility amidst persistent domestic violence in contemporary Nigerian marriages. Critical Research on Religion, 13(3), 355–366.

Ahmad, R., Nawaz, M. R., Ishaq, M. I., Khan, M. M., & Ashraf, H. A. (2023). Social exchange theory: Systematic review and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1015921.

Ali, S., Shahzad, F., Hussain, I., Yongjian, P., Khan, M. M., & Iqbal, Z. (2022). The outcomes of organizational cronyism: A social exchange theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 805262.

Anwar, A., Mohsin, M. R., & Sadiquee, M. (2025). Causative Factors Behind Shattered Marriages in Sargodha District: A Qualitative Analysis. Journal of Social Horizons, 2(3), 416–423.

Chabelita, A., Soselisa, P. S., & Sakir, A. R. (2024). Efektivitas Program Pembangunan Desa di Dusun Rumah Olat Desa Sawai Kecamatan Seram Utara Kabupaten Maluku Tengah. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(5), 9644–9655.

Croll, E. (2023). The exchange of women and property: Marriage in post-revolutionary China. In Women and Property (pp. 44–61). Routledge.

Gamella, J. F., & Muntean, V. M. (2023). Marriage and the reproductive regime of a digitally connected Roma diaspora. Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, 31(3), 533–559.

Gupta, G. R. (2023). Marriage, religion and society: Pattern of change in an Indian village. Routledge.

Jun, M., & Eckardt, R. (2025). Training and employee turnover: A social exchange perspective. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 28(1), 304–323.

Ruciswandaru, R., Evelyn, E., Hamka, M. A., & Ratnasari, Y. (2025). Finding reward in cost: A study of marriage satisfaction in Ta’aruf from the perspective of social exchange theory. Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 4(2), 80–89.

Sakir, A. R. (2025). PUBLIC SERVICE MANAGEMENT IN ARCHIPELAGIC REGIONS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW. EMAS, 6(10), 2509–2518.

Tsen, M. K., Gu, M., Tan, C. M., & Goh, S. K. (2022). Does flexible work arrangements decrease or increase turnover intention? A comparison between the social exchange theory and border theory. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 42(11–12), 962–983.

Ulinnuha, M. (2025). HARMONY OF INTERFAITH MARRIAGES IN SOCIAL AND RELIGIOUS RELATIONS PERSPECTIVE OF SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEORY. PROCEEDING INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ISLAM, LAW, AND SOCIETY, 4(1).

Wang, X., Chen, H., Chen, Z., & Luo, S. (2022). An exchange orientation results in an instrumental approach in intimate relationships. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(4), 1144–1159.

Wulandari, D., Rahawarin, M. A., & Sakir, A. R. (2025). The influence of e-government system implementation on the accessibility of public health services. Tamalanrea: Journal of Government and Development (JGD), 2(2), 118–131.

Xu, S., Wang, Y.-C., & Ma, E. (2022). A workplace-driven model on the formation of OCB-C: perspectives of social exchange theory and agency theory. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 34(7), 2684–2703.