Reflection-Based Academic Supervision: The Principal’s Effort to Improve Learning Quality at SDN 02 Sidorejo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v14i4.6476Keywords:
Academic Supervision, Reflective Supervision, Instructional Improvement, Learning Quality, Principal LeadershipAbstract
This study aims to describe how reflective-based academic supervision is implemented by the principal as an effort to improve learning quality at SDN 02 Sidorejo. Using a qualitative descriptive case study design, data were collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and documentation. The findings reveal that academic supervision is carried out through a reflective cycle consisting of planning, implementation, evaluation, and follow-up. In the planning stage, teachers are involved in identifying instructional problems and determining improvement priorities. During implementation, supervision is conducted using clinical steps: pre-observation discussions, classroom observation, and reflective conferencing. The follow-up phase includes mentoring, lesson study, peer coaching, and reflective journals. The results show improvements in teacher pedagogical competence, including lesson planning, classroom management, and instructional media use. Student learning outcomes also increase, demonstrating positive instructional impact. Reflective academic supervision positions the principal as a coach and collaborator, fostering a culture of continuous improvement and professional growth.
References
Alam, M. J., Haque, A. K. M. M., & Banu, A. (2021). Academic supervision for improving quality education in primary schools of Bangladesh: Concept, issues and implications. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 14(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2021/v14i330359
Avalos, B. (2019). Teacher professional learning and development in Chile: From policy to practice. Professional Development in Education, 45(2), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1550103
Beringuel, F. C., Capili, P. L. G., Medilo Jr, G. C., Daguplo, M. S., Bendulo, H. O., & Hungo, M. (2025). Significant effects of classroom observation on teacher development: Contribution to educational management in public elementary schools. Diversitas Journal, 10(1), 323–349. https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v10i1.3238
Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2023). Educational leadership preparation and development in Africa: A literature review. International Journal of Educational Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-01-2025-0005
Cintya, R., Amaliyah, K., & Pratiwi, N. (2015). Supervisi pembelajaran dan pengembangan profesionalisme guru. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 8(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpd.008.01.03
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fahrezi, M., Siahaan, A., & Nahar, S. (2024). Determinant factors of teacher quality in state Islamic elementary schools. Fitrah: Journal of Islamic Education, 5(2), 218–233. https://doi.org/10.53802/fitrah.v5i2.1346
Fitria, H., & Lestari, R. (2022). Digital-based supervision through e-coaching to improve teacher professionalism. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 9(3), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2022.93.141.148
Gunawan, I. (2017). Metode penelitian kualitatif: Teori dan praktik. Bumi Aksara.
Hallinger, P., Wang, R., & Chen, C. (2020). Assessing the role of principal instructional leadership in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 96, 103190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103190
Karaca, F., & Ocak, G. (2019). Reflective supervision practices and their impact on instructional improvement. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 19(81), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.81.3
Knight, J. (2019). The impact cycle: What instructional coaches should do to foster powerful improvements in teaching. Corwin Press.
Kompri. (2017). Standardisasi kompetensi kepala sekolah: Pendekatan teori untuk praktik profesional. Kencana.
Lawrence, J., & Chong, W. (2020). Post-supervision coaching and its influence on teaching transformation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48(4), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2019.1688950
Lee, J., & Choi, H. (2020). Teacher participation in supervision planning and affective commitment. Professional Development in Education, 46(5), 832–847. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2019.1705889
Mediatati, N., & Jati, D. H. P. (2022). Supervisi kepala sekolah: Peningkatan kualitas pembelajaran guru dan hasil belajar peserta didik. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 6(3), 422–431. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppp.v6i3.38794
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi revisi). Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mukni’ah. (2024). Supervisi kepala sekolah dan optimalisasi kinerja guru di era digital. IAIN Madura Press.
Mulyani, N., & Fahrurrozi, F. (2021). Peran kepala sekolah sebagai agen perubahan dalam pelaksanaan
Mustafa, M., & Widodo, A. (2021). Collaborative supervision planning and teacher ownership in instructional quality improvement. Jadila: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 9(2), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.24127/ja.v9i2.4658
Nguyen, H., & Hunter, D. (2021). Reflective dialogue as a tool for effective supervision. Educational Review, 73(4), 525–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1704065
Orgoványi-Gajdos, J. (2016). Teachers' defensive attitudes in supervision. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(3), 350–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1184882
Pertiwi, D. L., & Suherman, U. (2022). Supervisi berbasis kebutuhan individual guru. Jurnal Pembelajaran dan Supervisi, 10(3), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.21009/jps.v10i3.11456
Prasojo, L. D., & Sudiyanto. (2020). Peran kepala sekolah dalam meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 14(2), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.21831/jmp.v14i2.31467
Rahimi, M., & Hosseini, Z. (2020). Teacher acceptance of feedback in non-judgmental supervision settings. Teaching and Teacher Education, 94, 103115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103115
Rahman, A., Yusuf, T., & Malik, R. (2022). Needs assessment-based supervision planning. Educational Horizon, 14(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.17509/eh.v14i1.42712
Risnawati, R. (2021). Supervisi akademik kepala sekolah dalam meningkatkan kompetensi guru. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 8(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.17509/jap.v8i1.31245
Sagala, S. (2020). Konsep dan makna pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan. Alfabeta.
Sammons, P., et al. (2021). Professional reflection and student achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(4), 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2021.1918893
Santosa, D. (2020). Strategi penelitian pendidikan kualitatif. Deepublish.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2019). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (8th ed.). Wiley.
Smith, J., & Harris, K. (2019). Collaborative supervision planning and teacher retention. School Leadership & Management, 39(3–4), 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1636005
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Supriyati, N., Baharuddin, B., & Sutiah, S. (2024). Enhancing academic supervision of Madrasah principals through lesson study initiatives. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(4), 5325–5334. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.4965
Sutrisno, E. (2019). Teknik observasi dalam penelitian kualitatif pendidikan. Deepublish.
Tsai, C., & Ku, H. (2022). Coaching-based supervision and classroom inclusivity. Journal of Education for Teaching, 48(2), 184–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1923710
Uno, H. B. (2021). Model pembelajaran: Menciptakan proses belajar yang kreatif dan efektif. Bumi Aksara.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Yin, Y., Shavelson, R. J., Ayala, C. C., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Brandon, P. R., Furtak, E. M., & Young, D. B. (2018). On the impact of formative assessment on student motivation, achievement, and conceptual change. Applied Measurement in Education, 21(4), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957340802347845




.png)













