APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF PRUDENCE AND PRECISION FOR NOTARIES IN MAKING DEEDS (STUDY AT THE NOTARY OFFICE OF HERNY WAHDANIYAH WAHAB, S.H., M.KN.)

PENERAPAN PRINSIP KEHATI-HATIAN DAN KETELITIAN BAGI NOTARIS DALAM MEMBUAT AKTA (STUDI DI KANTOR NOTARIS HERNY WAHDANIYAH WAHAB, S.H., M.KN.)

Authors

  • Sheilla Yudha Pradina Magister Kenotariatan, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Islam Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v14i3.6011

Abstract

A notary in his position as a public official who has the authority to make deeds, makes the deeds he makes have very perfect evidentiary power. In this case, all deeds made by a notary or before a notary must be carried out with the principles of prudence, thoroughness and responsibility, because notary is a position that is obtained from the trust given by the law and society. So if the trust that has been given by the law (law) and the public is violated by the Notary, then the Notary must be held accountable for what he has done. In this case, the formulation of the problem in this research is as follows (1) What is the form of the Principle of Prudence and Accuracy for Notaries in making Deeds? (2) What is the Notary's responsibility for a deed that has been made but there are errors or errors such as typos or incorrect identities of the parties? The research methodology in this thesis is as follows: this research is included in empirical research using a sociological research approach. The data collection techniques are by means of interviews and also observation. The research location is at the Notary Office Herny Wahdaniyah Wahab, S.H., M.Kn (Notary in Malang Regency). As for technical data analysis, researchers use a deductive method, namely a method of drawing conclusions from general provisions to specific ones. In this research, there are the following conclusions. The forms of the principle of prudence and accuracy for notaries in making deeds are as follows: (1) The form of the principle of prudence that is applied and implemented is as follows: (1) verifying the facing data, ( 2) accommodate the wishes of the parties, (3)Review repeat/double check regarding the data and deeds made. The form of the prudential principle applied and implemented in this case is in accordance with the prudential principle in banking, namely the 4P formula:Personality, Purpose, Prospect, andPayment. The form of accuracy that can be carried out by a notary is to check/scrutinize the identity of the presenters, including signatures, photos, fingerprints, objects and deeds before/after being printed before/after being read in front of the presenter. (2) The responsibility of the Notary for deeds that have been made but contain errors or errors such as typos and incorrect identities of the parties is the Renvoi method. In this case, there is a form of civil liability that can be carried out by a notary if the error can cause losses. This is regulated in Article 1365 of the Civil Code.

References

Abidin, A. M., Ali, Moh., & Azizah, A. (2024). Prinsip Kehati-Hatian yang Dilakukan Notaris dalam Penyimpanan Minuta Akta Notaris. J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah, 3(5), 3980–3987. https://doi.org/10.56799/JCEKI.V3I5.4094

Adjie, H. (1994). Kebatalan dan Pembatalan Akta Notaris. Surabaya.

Adjie, H. (2022). Hukum Kenotariatan Indonesia Jilid 2. Media Sains Indonesia.

Andrianto, A. D., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Astiti, N. G. K. S. (2023). Penerapan Asas Kehati-Hatian dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik oleh Notaris. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 4(1), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.22225/JPH.4.1.6568.23-27

Anshori, A. G. (2009). Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia. UII Press.

Ariswanda, T. A. (2024). Penerapan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian oleh Notaris dalam Perjanjian Nominee (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 4223 K/Pdt/2022). JOURNAL SAINS STUDENT RESEARCH, 2(4), 706–719. https://doi.org/10.61722/JSSR.V2I4.2047

Arliman, L. (2015). Notaris dan Penegakan Hukum oleh Hakim. CV Budi Utama.

Bachtiar. (2019). Metode Penelitian Hukum. UNPAM Press.

Bintang, A., Aljamili, M. F., Griptoni, G., Lasmini, L., & Ningsih, W. M. (2025). Batasan Tanggung Jawab Hukum Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Adagium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 3(1), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.70308/adagium.v3i1.65

Budiono, H. (2014). Dasar Teknik Pembuatan Akta Notaris. Citra Aditia Bakti.

Darus, M. L. H. (2018). Hukum Notariat dan Tanggung Jawab Jabatan Notaris. UII Press.

Hamzah, A. (1986). Kamus Hukum. Ghalia Indonesia.

Hidayah, F. N. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik yang Penghadapnya Menggunakan Identitas Palsu dalam Perspektif Hukum Intenasional. Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia, 44–53. https://journal.uii.ac.id/psha/article/view/42236

Mahalini, N. K. D. P., Sariani, N. L. P., & Puspadewi, A. A. A. I. (2025). Legalitas Renvoi Terhadap Kekeliruan dalam Akta Notaris. Jurnal Pengabdi, 8(1), 2620–4673. https://doi.org/10.26418/JPLP2KM.V8I1.83984

Marbun, S. F. (1997). Peradilan Administrasi Negara dan Upaya Administrasi di Indonesia. Liberty.

Mertokusumo, S. (1979). Penemuan Hukum Sebuah Pengantar. Liberty.

Moechtar, O. (2017). Dasar-dasar Teknik Pembuatan Akta. Airlangga University Press.

Muhammad, A. (2024). Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Citra Aditya.

Notodisury, S. R. (2000). Hukum Notariat di Indonesia: Suatu Penjelasan. Rajawali Pres.

Pandoman, A. (2017). Teknik Pembuatan Akta-Akta Notaris. Raga Utama Kreasi.

Pratama, B., Warsito, H., & Adriansyah, H. (2022). Prinsip Kehati-Hatian dalam Membuat Akta Oleh Notaris. Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 11(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.28946/RPT.V11I1.1640

Qotrannadha, D., & Tanawijaya, H. (2023). Penerapan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik yang Penghadapnya Menggunakan Identitas Palsu. Syntax Literate ; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 8(5), 3188–3197. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v8i5.11804

Rostarum, T. (2024). Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Notaris di Era Digital: Implementasi dalam mewujudkan Akta yang Sempurna. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 24(3), 2302–2307. https://doi.org/10.33087/JIUBJ.V24I3.5681

Safitri, N. P. (2024). Application of the Precautionary Principle of Notary in Making Authentic Deed Against the Use of False Identity. As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga, 6(2), 2165–2179. https://doi.org/10.47467/as.v6i2.6986

Saripurwasih, G. (2024). Penerapan Electronic Know Your Customer (E-Kyc) Berbasis Nomor Induk Kependudukan (NIK) Dikaitkan dengan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian (Prudentiality Principle) Notaris dalam Membuat Akta. Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan Otentik’s, 6(2), 128–150. https://doi.org/10.35814/OTENTIK.V6I2.7067

Setiawan, I. K. O. (2017). Hukum Perikatan. Sinar Grafika.

Soepadmo, D. (1994). Teknik Pembuatan Akta Seri B-1. PT. Bina Ilmu.

Sukma, N. M. (2025). Ketidakhati-Hatian Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Berakibat Tidak Sah Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Rapat. Equality : Journal of Law and Justice, 2(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.69836/equality-jlj.v2i2.299

Thamrin, H. (2011). Pembuatan Akta Pertanahan oleh Notaris. Laksbang Pressindo.

Wibowo, O. S., Tejakusuma, E. K., & Tondy, M. B. (2025). Kedudukan Akta Notaris sebagai Akta Otentik dengan Adanya Keterangan Palsu yang Tertuang di dalam Akta. JATISWARA, 40(1), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.29303/jtsw.v40i1.1172

Downloads

Published

2025-09-07

How to Cite

Pradina, S. Y. (2025). APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF PRUDENCE AND PRECISION FOR NOTARIES IN MAKING DEEDS (STUDY AT THE NOTARY OFFICE OF HERNY WAHDANIYAH WAHAB, S.H., M.KN.): PENERAPAN PRINSIP KEHATI-HATIAN DAN KETELITIAN BAGI NOTARIS DALAM MEMBUAT AKTA (STUDI DI KANTOR NOTARIS HERNY WAHDANIYAH WAHAB, S.H., M.KN.). SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL, 14(3), 1704–1715. https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v14i3.6011