DJP EMPLOYEE MANIPULATION PRACTICES FROM A CRITICAL THEORY PERSPECTIVE: THE TAX PARADOX AS AN IDEOLOGICAL TOOL AND FISCAL INSTRUMENT FOR COLLECTING STATE REVENUE

Authors

  • Muhammad Ikbal Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Endang Herliah Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Suryaningsi Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Venna Puspita Sari Universitas Balikpapan, Balikpapan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v14i3.5654

Keywords:

Budget Policy, Community Empowerment, Advanced Villages

Abstract

The integrity of tax administration in Indonesia faces significant challenges due to emerging patterns of fraud involving officials from the Directorate General of Taxes (DJP) who privately hold shares in tax consultancy firms. This phenomenon reflects a deeper systemic issue where taxation, ideally serving as both a fiscal tool and an ideological instrument for economic justice, is co-opted for personal gain. Our current study aims to critically examine how such ownership structures create conflicts of interest and facilitate corruption within the tax system. Employing a qualitative research design, we adopt a critical theory framework—particularly the Frankfurt School tradition—and apply the Fraud Triangle model to interpret fraud patterns. Data were collected through content analysis of national media coverage and in-depth interviews with taxation experts, anti-corruption officials, and academics. Findings reveal that insider access and authority are exploited to manipulate tax obligations, weakening public trust and undermining the redistributive function of tax policy. These actions create systemic risks by normalizing unethical behavior within public institutions. Our study emphasizes the need for independent oversight, stricter conflict-of-interest regulations, and reforms in ethical governance to restore institutional credibility and enhance tax compliance.

References

Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (1997). Dialectic of enlightenment (Vol. 15). Verso.

Aguiar, M. A., Moll, B., & Scheuer, F. (2024). Putting the" Finance" into" Public Finance": A Theory of Capital Gains Taxation (No. w32951). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Amoh, J. K., & Ali-Nakyea, A. (2019). Does corruption cause tax evasion? Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 22(2), 217-232.

BBS News Indonesia., 2010. Depkeu ungkap penggelapan pajak https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/ berita_indonesia/2010/05/100503_pajak diakses 14 Januari 2025

Bogdanovic, M. (2016). Manipulation of human mind as dominant strategy in achieving tax compliance. Romanian Economic and Business Review, 11(1), 24.

Braithwaite, V. (2020). Beyond the bubble that is Robodebt: How governments that lose integrity threaten democracy. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 242-259.

Causa, O., & Hermansen, M. (2020). Income redistribution through taxes and transfers across OECD countries. In Inequality, redistribution and mobility (Vol. 28, pp. 29-74). Emerald Publishing Limited.

Cheliatsidou, A., Garefalakis, A., & Sariannidis, N. (2024). Opportunities for fraud in Greek Municipalities; The International Fraud Triangle framework. Εκπαίδευση, Δια Βίου Μάθηση, Έρευνα και Τεχνολογική Ανάπτυξη, Καινοτομία και Οικονομία, 3, 1-18.

Chernousova, K. S. (2020, October). Tax monitoring as an instrument of state support. In Innovative Economic Symposium (pp. 809-814). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Cressey, D.R. (1953), Other People's Money: A study in the social psychology of Embezzlement, The Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois

Dalwadi, P. (2023). Uncovering financial fraud: the role of forensic accounting in preventing and detecting fraud in India. International Journal of Management, Public Policy and Research, 2(2), 1-5.

de La Feria, R. (2020). Tax fraud and selective law enforcement. Journal of law and Society, 47(2), 240-270.

Drogalas, G., Pazarskis, M., Mitskinis, D., & Koulikas, A. (2024). The contribution of internal audit to fraud audit: evidence from Greece. International Journal of Critical Accounting, 14(1), 50-67.

Ezenwaka, U., Gatome-Munyua, A., Nwankwor, C., Olalere, N., Orji, N., Ewelike, U., ... & Onwujekwe, O. (2022). Strategic health purchasing in Nigeria: investigating governance and institutional capacities within federal tax-funded health schemes and the formal sector social health insurance programme. Health Systems & Reform, 8(2), e2074630.

Fedulova, E., Salkova, O., & Zverev, R. (2020, March). Evaluation Methods of Tax Burden on a Company as a Mean of Financial Optimization Problems Solving. In International Scientific Conference" Far East Con" (ISCFEC 2020) (pp. 174-178). Atlantis Press.

Fraser, N. (2013). What's critical about critical theory?. In Feminists Read Habermas (RLE Feminist Theory) (pp. 21-55). Routledge.

García, G. A., Azorín, J. D. B., & de la Vega, M. D. M. S. (2018). Tax evasion in Europe: an analysis based on spatial dependence. Social Science Quarterly, 99(1), 7-23.

Gorsira, M., Steg, L., Denkers, A., & Huisman, W. (2018). Corruption in organisations: Ethical climate and individual motives. Administrative Sciences, 8(1), 4.

Hashim, H. A., Salleh, Z., Shuhaimi, I., & Ismail, N. A. N. (2020). The risk of financial fraud: a management perspective. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(4), 1143-1159.

Hegarty, J. (2024). Living in the tension: an organisational decision-making framework and paradigm. Journal of Decision Systems, 1-19.

Hermanson, D. R., & Wolfe, D. T. (2024). The Fraud Diamond. CPA Journal, 94.

Hien, J. (2021). Culture and tax avoidance: the case of Italy. Critical Policy Studies, 15(2), 247-268.

IKPI. 2023. Survei Indikator: Kepercayaan Masyarakat Terhadap DJP Capai 83,7%, https://ikpi.or.id/en/survei-indikator-kepercayaan-masyarakat-terhadap-djp-capai-837/

Kassem, R. (2022). How could external auditors assess the rationalisation of fraud?. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(4), 1458-1467.

Khan, A., & Krishnan, S. (2019). Conceptualising the impact of corruption in national institutions and national stakeholder service systems on e-government maturity. International Journal of Information Management, 46, 23-36.

Kochel, T. R., & Skogan, W. G. (2021). Accountability and transparency as levers to promote public trust and police legitimacy: Findings from a natural experiment. Policing: an international journal, 44(6), 1046-1059.

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.

Maulidi, A. (2023). Philosophical understanding of the dynamics and control of occupational fraud in the public sector: contingency analysis. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 39(2), 432-463.

McKenna, F., Pevzner, M., Sheneman, A. G., & Zach, T. (2023). Corruption in the auditor inspection process: The case of KPMG and the PCAOB. Issues in Accounting Education Teaching Notes, 38(2), TN93-TN116.

Nasir, M., Simsek, S., Cornelsen, E., Ragothaman, S., & Dag, A. (2021). Developing a decision support system to detect material weaknesses in internal control. Decision Support Systems, 151, 113631.

Peralta-Borray, D. A., Acuña, J. S., & Zapata, S. (2024). A grounded theory of tolerance of corruption in public organisations: emotion, rationalisation and whistleblowing–the Colombian case. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 19(3), 203-225.

Rubin, V. L. (2010). On deception and deception detection: Content analysis of computer‐mediated stated beliefs. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(1), 1-10.

Rustiarini, N. W., Nurkholis, N., & Andayani, W. (2019). Why people commit public procurement fraud? The fraud diamond view. Journal of public procurement, 19(4), 345-362.

Schwartz, D. M. (2019). Financial predictors of fraud in nonprofit organisations.

Suh, J. B., Nicolaides, R., & Trafford, R. (2019). The effects of reducing opportunity and fraud risk factors on the occurrence of occupational fraud in financial institutions. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 56, 79-88.

Svetlozarova Nikolova, B. (2023). Improving Prevention and Diagnostics in Tax Control. In Tax Audit and Taxation in the Paradigm of Sustainable Development: The Impact on Economic, Social and Environmental Development (pp. 119-136). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

Times of India, 2022. Informer approaches High Court, seeks 20% share of ₹23 crore recovered in tax evasion case. https://tinyurl.com/3kx4jppr accessed at 16 January 2025

Downloads

Published

2025-08-15

How to Cite

Muhammad Ikbal, Endang Herliah, Suryaningsi, & Venna Puspita Sari. (2025). DJP EMPLOYEE MANIPULATION PRACTICES FROM A CRITICAL THEORY PERSPECTIVE: THE TAX PARADOX AS AN IDEOLOGICAL TOOL AND FISCAL INSTRUMENT FOR COLLECTING STATE REVENUE. SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL, 14(3), 1362–1370. https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v14i3.5654