PSYCHOLOGY AND THE LAW: LITERATURE REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM
Abstract
In the context of the Indonesian justice system, these psychological factors can also play an important role. Individual trust in the Indonesian justice system can be influenced by personal experience, perceptions about the integrity and quality of judges, as well as belief in the effectiveness of the justice system in providing justice to society. If individuals have low trust in the justice system, they may be reluctant to involve themselves in the justice process or feel that the decisions taken are unfair. This research uses the type or research approach of Library Research. The Miles and Huberman data analysis model is the method used in this research. By understanding the psychological factors involved in the Indonesian justice system, we can increase the effectiveness and success of the justice system in enforcing the law and achieving justice. Research that has been conducted shows that psychological factors such as individual trust in the justice system, empathy and recognition in restorative justice, stress and trauma in military personnel, as well as cognitive biases and the tendency to avoid risk in administrative cases can influence decisions and performance in justice system. Therefore, it is important for parties involved in the Indonesian justice system, such as judges, bureaucrats, and military personnel, to consider these psychological factors in their decision-making processes.
References
Derek Robbins, 2001, The work of Pierre Bourdieu: recognizing society, Colorado: Westview Press
George R. Terry, 2008, Prinsip-prinsip Manajemen, Yogyakarta: Bumi Aksara
Intan Rahmawati, 2022, Pengantar Psikologi Sosial, Jakarta: Penerbit Bumi Aksara
Irving B. Weiner, Allen K. Hess, 2006, The Handbook of Forensic Psychology, US: John Wiley & Sons
J. Dywan dan W.E. Murphy, 1995, Cumulated Index Medicus Volume 36, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Library of Medicine
J. Supranto, 2003, Metode penelitian hukum dan statistic, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
James A. F. Stoner, 1996, Manajemen, Jakarta: Prenhallindo
Jonathan Sarwono, 2006, Metode penelitian kuantitatif & kualitatif, Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu
Mahmud Kusuma, 2019, Menyelami Semangat Hukum Progresif, Terapi Paradigma Bagi Lemahnya Hukum Indonesia, Yogyakarta: AntonyLibrary
Mansyur Kartayasa, “Restorative Justice dan Prospeknya dalam Kebijakan Legislasi”makalah disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional, Peran Hakim dalam Meningkatkan Profesionalisme.Menuju Penelitian yang Agung, Diselenggarakan IKAHI dalam rangka Ulang Tahun IKAHI ke59, 25 April 2012
Mestika Zed, 2018, Metode penelitian kepustakaan, Jakarta : Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia
Muladi, 1995, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro
Richardson, herbert, 1980, New religions & mental health :understanding the issues, New York : The Edwin Mellen Press
Sondang P. Siagian, 2014, Sistem Informasi Manajemen, Yogyakarta: Bumi Aksara
Sugiyono, 2012, Metode penelitian bisnis, Bandung: Alfabeta
Suharsimi Arikunto 2010, Manajemen penelitian, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Tim Penyusun, 1990, Ensiklopedi Nasional Indonesia : Jilid 13, Jakarta : PT Cipta Adi Pustaka
Ujam Jaenudin, 2017, Psikologi Forensik, Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia
Wilhem Wundt, 2017, Compendio Di Psicologia, Italia: createspace independent publishing platform