MAKING STUDENTHOOD LEGIBLE: DISCIPLINARY INFORMATION AND SUBJECT POSITIONING ACROSS CONNECTED SCHOOL AND RESIDENTIAL SPACES

Authors

  • Ayu Dwi Lestari Universitas Sriwijaya
  • M. Ridhah Taqwa Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Dadang Hikmah Purnama Universitas Sriwijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i4.9750

Keywords:

Disciplinary Power; Institutional Legibility; Subject Positioning Educational; Governance Boarding Education; Michel Foucault

Abstract

Educational institutions do more than regulate conduct. They make students visible, comparable, and recognisable within institutional categories. This article examines that process at Sekolah Rakyat Menengah Atas (SRMA) 7 Palembang, Indonesia. The qualitative case study analyses hierarchical observation, normalising judgement, and examination. It draws on interviews with one principal, one teacher, one caregiver, and seven students. Two institutional student reports supplement these accounts. The findings show that routines distribute opportunities for observation. Normative standards differentiate everyday conduct. Examination converts selected conduct into institutional information through assessment, documentation, and reporting. Such information can extend the relevance of conduct beyond the encounter where it was observed. Student accounts also reveal habituated adherence, situational non-compliance, avoidance, and performed compliance. The “disciplined student” therefore emerges as a situated subject position rather than a fixed identity. Institutional recognition therefore cannot be equated with internalised discipline. The article specifies an identity-oriented dimension of Foucauldian discipline. Selected conduct can become portable information and make studenthood recognisable across organisational relations. The study does not establish causal behavioural change, stable identity transformation, or generalisation beyond the case.

References

Beighton, C., & Naz, Z. (2026). Regulating Truths, Indeterminate Practice and Ways of Being: A Biopolitics of Professional Standards in UK Higher Education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 47(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2025.2483199

Berk, C. D. (2025). Between Worlds: Identity, Culture, and Ambivalence in a Boarding School for “at-risk” Youth. The Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics, 10(2), 580–602. https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2025.23

Çeven, G., Korumaz, M., & Ömür, Y. E. (2021). Disciplinary Power in The School: Panoptic Surveillance. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 16(1), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2020.334.9

Drew, C. (2020). To Follow a Rule: The Construction of Student Subjectivities on Classroom Rules Charts. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 21(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949118798207

Estélles, M. (2025). A Dangerous Turn: The Confluence of Safety and Citizenship Discourses in Educational Scholarship. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 46(5), 612–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2024.2443915

Foucault, M. (2016). Discipline and Punish. In Social Theory Re-Wired. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775357-34

Kyei, S. (2025). Boarding School, Indigenous Knowledge, and The Formation of Adolescent Identity: The Case of Asante Youth in Ghana. African Identities, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2025.2593932

Kyei, S. (2026). Boarding School Experiences and Identity Formation among Adolescents: Insights from Senior High Schools in Ashanti, Central, Greater Accra, and Western Regions of Ghana. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 13(1), 805. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07110-5

Liu, J., Wu, B., & Qu, J. (2022). Chinese Adolescents’ Struggle in Online Compulsory Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Foucauldian Perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 1705–1723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10688-9

Madsen, M. (2023). Set in Motion by Data: Human and Data Intra-Actions in Educational Governance. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 44(2), 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2021.1984211

Markoff, B. (2025). Beyond The Discipline Gap: The Role of Spectacular State Violence in The Discipline and Punishment of Black and Indigenous Children in US Public Schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 46(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2024.2378304

Meadmore, D. (1993). The Production of Individuality through Examination. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 14(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569930140104

Nieminen, J. H. (2025). How Does Assessment Shape Student Identities? An Integrative Review. Studies in Higher Education, 50(2), 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2334844

Noviani, D., & Azkar, Muh. (2024). Student Disciplinary Practices in a Boarding School Environment: A Sociological Review. Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education, 5(3), 391–399. https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v5i3.1081

Perryman, J. (2006). Panoptic Performativity and School Inspection Regimes: Disciplinary Mechanisms and Life Under Special Measures. Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500500138

Robinson, S., Pope, D., & Holyoak, L. (2013). Can We Meet Their Expectations? Experiences and Perceptions of Feedback in First Year Undergraduate Students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(3), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.629291

Rose, P. A. (2023). Contradictory Realities and Competing Perspectives: How Discourses in Education Shape The Teacher-Self. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1190551

Worthman, C., & Troiano, B. (2019). A Good Student Subject: A Foucauldian Discourse Analysis of an Adolescent Writer Negotiating Subject Positions. Critical Studies in Education, 60(2), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2016.1246372

Xu, K., & Chen, J. (2024). Disciplining The Online Class: Control and Resistance of Rural Students in China During The COVID-19 Pandemic. Power and Education, 16(2), 166–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/17577438231187130

Zhou, Q. (2024). Children’s Emotional Geographies at a Boarding School in Rural China. Children’s Geographies, 22(4), 549–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2024.2313521

Zomer, C., Pangrazio, L., & Matovich, I. (2026). The Dashboard School: Governing Teachers, Students and Parents in The Data-Driven School. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 47(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2025.2519383

Downloads

Published

2026-10-29

How to Cite

Lestari, A. D., Taqwa, M. R., & Purnama, D. H. (2026). MAKING STUDENTHOOD LEGIBLE: DISCIPLINARY INFORMATION AND SUBJECT POSITIONING ACROSS CONNECTED SCHOOL AND RESIDENTIAL SPACES. SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL, 15(4), 164–175. https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i4.9750