ENGLISH TEACHERS’ LEARNING RESOURCES ADAPTATION: AN ANALYSIS ON TEACHER AGENCY IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i3.9301Keywords:
Learning Resource Adaptation, Teacher Agency, Textbook, Online ResourcesAbstract
Learning resource adaptation is an important aspect of English language teaching because teachers need to align instructional materials with students’ learning needs, classroom conditions, and instructional objectives. Although previous studies have examined instructional material adaptation, limited attention has been given to how such practices constitute an enactment of teacher agency in Indonesian secondary school contexts. This study explores how English teachers adapt learning resources and how these practices reflect teacher agency. A qualitative case study was conducted with three EFL teachers from secondary schools in Bandung, Indonesia. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and documentary evidence of adapted and teacher-made learning resources and analysed qualitatively to identify patterns of resource adaptation and teacher agency. The findings show that teachers adapted learning resources through selecting, supplementing, modifying, and selectively replacing materials according to students’ needs and classroom conditions. The extent and form of adaptation varied: one teacher substantially modified materials from different sources, another integrated digital resources with the prescribed textbook, while the third relied primarily on the government-issued textbook and selectively used supplementary materials. These practices reflected teacher agency through professional judgement, autonomy in resource selection, collaborative lesson planning, and context-sensitive instructional decision-making. The study contributes theoretically by positioning learning resource adaptation as a concrete enactment of teacher agency in English language teaching. Practically, it highlights the need for professional development, institutional support, and instructional flexibility to enable teachers to develop contextually responsive learning practices.
References
Biesta, G. (2013). The beautiful risk of education. Paradigm Publishers.
Block, D. (1991). Some thoughts on DIY materials design. ELT Journal, 45(3), 211–217.
Chaaban, Y., & Sawalhi, R. (2020). Teachers as policy actors: Agency, resistances, and enablers in challenging educational contexts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 88, 102964.
Çakır, İ. (2010). An analysis of teachers’ perceptions towards their use of textbooks and materials in ELT classrooms. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2), 175–184.
Çakır, İ. (2015). Instructional materials and methodology in ELT: An analysis of the available resources. Hacettepe University Press.
Cunningsworth, A. (1984). Evaluating and selecting EFL teaching materials. Heinemann Educational Books.
Ellington, H. (1987). Handbook of educational technology. Nichols Publishing.
Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45–65.
Fu, G., & Clarke, A. (2017). Teacher agency in response to the 21st-century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(6), 803–821.
Harwood, N. (2005). What do we want EAP teaching materials for? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(2), 149–161.
Lynch, T. (2005). Communication in the language classroom. Oxford University Press.
Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Nguyen, H., & Bui, T. (2016). Teacher agency in the Vietnamese higher education reform context. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(3), 499–511.
Pakkan, K. (1997). Material design and development in ELT. Anadolu University Press.
Pardo, A. N., & Téllez-Téllez, M. F. (2009). ELT materials: The key to fostering effective teaching and learning settings. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 11(2), 171–186.
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury.
Richards, J. C. (2001). Richards, J. C. (2001). The Role of Textbooks in a Language Program. Cambridge University Press.
Cambridge University Press.
Rivera Cuayahuitl, R., & Pérez Carranza, J. (2015). The role of textbooks in language teaching and learning. Mextesol Journal, 39(4), 1–13.
Roessing, L., & Johnson, B. (2004). Teacher-created versus publisher-created materials: Perspectives and practices. Teaching and Learning Journal, 10(2), 15–25.
Severance, S., Penuel, W., Sumner, T., & Leary, H. (2016). Teachers as designers of technology-integrated curriculum. Instructional Science, 44(1), 45–72.
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer.
Tao, J., & Gao, X. (2017). Teacher agency and identity commitment in curriculum reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 346–355.
Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45(2), 143–179.
Tsiplakides, I. (2011). Selecting and adapting materials in ELT. Journal of Language and Literature Education, 3, 75–86.
Zhang, Y. (2018). Revisiting the role of teacher agency in language curriculum development. Language Policy, 17(3), 381–405.





.png)














