EVALUATION OF THE ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM OF THE NORTH SUMATRA NATIONAL PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE (NPC) ATHLETES AT THE XVII NATIONAL PARALYMPIC GAMES (PEPARNAS) 2024

Authors

  • Afika Dwi Yulanda Department of Sport Science, Yogyakarta State University
  • Atikah Rahayu Yogyakarta State University
  • Rifky Riyandi Prastyawan Yogyakarta State University
  • Duwi Kurnianto Pambudi Yogyakarta State University
  • Rina Yuniana Yogyakarta State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i3.9206

Keywords:

CIPP, Evaluation, North Sumatra National Paralympic Committee (NPC), Para Athletics, Athlete Performance Development Program

Abstract

This study was motivated by the decline in medal achievements at the XVII National Paralympic Games (PEPARNAS) in 2024 compared to the previous PEPARNAS. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the athletic performance development program of the North Sumatra National Paralympic Committee (NPC) athletes at the XVII PEPARNAS 2024 using the CIPP evaluation model. This evaluation study employed a quantitative approach using a questionnaire as the research instrument. The data were analyzed using percentage calculations based on the Likert scale assessment criteria. The findings revealed that the context aspect achieved 77.98% according to the administrators, 74.40% according to the coaches, and 78.38% according to the athletes. The input aspect obtained 66.67% according to the administrators, 66.67% according to the coaches, and 66.85% according to the athletes. The process aspect achieved 75.52% according to the administrators, 70.83% according to the coaches, and 72.83% according to the athletes. Meanwhile, the product aspect obtained 62.50% according to the administrators, 68.75% according to the coaches, and 68.00% according to the athletes. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that the athletic performance development program of the North Sumatra National Paralympic Committee (NPC) is categorized as good and feasible to be continued. However, special attention should be given to the input aspect to optimize the implementation of the performance development program for future PEPARNAS events.

References

Anshori, M., & Muslich, S. (2019). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif.

Airlangga University Press.

Arifin, M., & Hadi, S. (2019). Evaluasi program pembinaan olahraga prestasi dalam meningkatkan kinerja atlet. Jurnal Keolahragaan Indonesia, 7(2), 85–94

Arikunto, S., & Jabar, C. S. A. (2014). Evaluasi program pendidikan: Pedoman teoretis praktis bagi mahasiswa dan praktisi pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Bompa, T. O., & Buzzichelli, C. (2019). Periodization-: theory and methodology of training. In Human kinetics.

Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020).

Creswell, J. W. A. (2021). Concise introduction to mixed methods research.

SAGE Publications.

Jamalong, A. (2016). Peningkatan prestasi olahraga nasional secara dini melalui Pusat Pembinaan dan Latihan Pelajar (PPLP) dan Pusat Pembinaan dan Latihan Mahasiswa (PPLM). Jurnal Pendidikan Olah Raga, 3(2), 156–168.

Kheryadi, K., Suseno, M., & Setiadi, S. (2022). Evaluasi Program Public Speaking “Muhadharah” Dengan Model (Cipp) Context, Input, Process and Product Pada Tingkat Sekolah Dasar. Holistika: Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD, 14-23.

Mutohir, T. C., & Maksum, A. (2007). Sport Development Index: Konsep, Metodologi, dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: PT Indeks.

Nugraha, P. D., & Pratama, E. B. (2019). Survei pembinaan prestasi atlet bola basket kelompok umur di bawah 16 dan 18 tahun. Journal Sport Area, 4(1), 240–248.

Nugroho, E. (2018). Prinsip-prinsip Menyusun Kuesioner. Universitas Brawijaya Press.

Pratama, K. Y. (2019). Implementasi Kebijakan Pembinaan Olahraga Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus Di Kota Yogyakarta. Spektrum Analisis Kebijakan Pendidikan, 8(3), 245- 250.

Rahmawati, D., Wiyanto, A., & Setyawan, D. A. (2020)

Saputra Adi Surya. (2020). Menjaga Imunitas dan Kesehatan Tubuh melalui Olahraga yang Efektif. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan STKIP Kusuma Negara II, II, 33–42

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP Evaluation Model: How to Evaluate for Improvement and Accountability. New York: Guilford Press.

Sugiyono, S., & Lestari, P. (2021). Metode penelitian komunikasi (Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan cara mudah menulis artikel pada jurnal internasional).

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. In Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sulistiyono. (n.d.). Tes Pengukuran dan Evaluasi Olahraga. UNY Press. UU No 11 Tahun 2022. (2022). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor

11 Tahun 2022 Tentang Sistem Keolahragaan Nasional. Presiden RI, 1, 1–53.

Waluyo, W. (2019). Olahraga Bagi Atlet Difabel. Phedheral, 16(1), 51. Yusuf, Jamaludin Yusuf, Mega Widya Putri, dan M. Riski Adi Wijaya. 2024.

“Evaluasi Program Pembinaan Prestasi Olahraga Panahan Klub Abirawa di Kabupaten Batang.” Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai 8(2): 31917–31929.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31

How to Cite

Afika Dwi Yulanda, Atikah Rahayu, Rifky Riyandi Prastyawan, Duwi Kurnianto Pambudi, & Rina Yuniana. (2026). EVALUATION OF THE ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM OF THE NORTH SUMATRA NATIONAL PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE (NPC) ATHLETES AT THE XVII NATIONAL PARALYMPIC GAMES (PEPARNAS) 2024 . SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL, 15(3), 494–501. https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i3.9206