THE MERAUKE–SINGAPORE CROCODILE SKIN TRADE NETWORK DURING THE DUTCH COLONIAL PERIOD

Authors

  • Kulyasin Kulyasin Universitas Cenderawasih Papua
  • Alim Mutaqin Universitas Cenderawasih Papua
  • Ade Sopyan Hadi Universitas Cenderawasih Papua
  • Fikstif Donal Lintong Universitas Cenderawasih Papua

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i1.9043

Keywords:

Crocodile skin, Colonial trade, Merauke, Dutch New Guinea, Exotic trade, IMEX

Abstract

This article examines the crocodile skin trade network that operated between Merauke  the southernmost district of Dutch New Guinea (Nederlands Nieuw-Guinea)  and Singapore as the principal entrepôt port of Southeast Asia during the Dutch colonial period, approximately from the early twentieth century until the territory's transfer to the United Nations in 1962. Drawing on Dutch colonial archives, marine biology reports, and international literature on the exotic skin trade, this article argues that the commodification of crocodile hides in Merauke constituted part of a broader system of natural resource exploitation linking colonial peripheries in Papua to European luxury markets via Singapore as a redistributive node. The Dutch trading company IMEX (Import en Export Maatschappij) emerged as a key actor integrating local hunters of the Marind-anim and Asmat peoples into global commodity chains. The article further demonstrates that large-scale unregulated hunting imposed serious ecological pressure on saltwater crocodile (Crocodylus porosus) populations in the region, planting the seeds of conservation discourse that emerged at the twilight of the colonial era.

References

Bone, R. C. (1958). The Dynamics of the Western New Guinea (Irian Barat) Problem. Cornell University Southeast Asia Program.

Boon, G. C. (2013). Technology and Entrepot Colonialism in Singapore, 1819–1940. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Daniels, W. (1929). Prohibition of the Importation of Orang Utan from Dutch East Indies into the Straits Settlements: Letter from W. Daniels to Colonial Secretary of Straits Settlements. National Archives of Singapore.

Garnaut, R., & Manning, C. (1974). Irian Jaya: The Transformation of a Melanesian Economy. Australian National University Press.

Group, I. C. S. (2009). Crocodylus novaeguineae: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. IUCN/SSC Crocodile Specialist Group.

Haag, N. A. Den. (1962). Archief van het Ministerie van Koloniën, Nederlandse Nieuw-Guinea, 1900–1962 [Arsip Kementerian Koloni Belanda, Nugini Belanda]. Nationaal Archief.

Hughes, J. D. (2009). An Environmental History of the World: Humankind’s Changing Role in the Community of Life (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Jelden, D. C. (1980). Preliminary Studies on the Breeding Biology of Crocodylus porosus and Crocodylus n. novaguineae on the Middle Sepik (Papua New Guinea). Amphibia-Reptilia, 1(3), 353–358.

Ken, W. L. (1978a). A History of Straits Settlements Foreign Trade 1870–1915. Koon Wah Lithographers.

Ken, W. L. (1978b). Singapore: Its Growth as an Entrepot Port, 1819–1941. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 9(1), 50–84.

Koentjaraningrat. (1994). Penduduk Irian Barat. PT. Penerbitan Universitas.

Nederlandsch-Indië, S. van. (1895). Staatsblad van Nederlandsch-Indië. 1895, No. 220 dan 221 [Tentang Penetapan Batas Wilayah Nugini Belanda dengan Wilayah Nugini Inggris].

Schoorl, P. (Ed.). (2001). Belanda di Irian Jaya: Amtenar di Masa Penuh Gejolak 1945–1962. Garba Budaya & KITLV-Jakarta.

Tan, Z. H. (2021). A Beastly Business: Regulating the Wildlife Trade in Colonial Singapore. BiblioAsia, 17(1).

van Baal, J. (1966). Dema: Description and Analysis of Marind-anim Culture (South New Guinea). Martinus Nijhoff.

Webb, G. J. W., Manolis, S. C., & Whitehead, P. J. (Eds.). (1987). Wildlife Management: Crocodiles and Alligators. Surrey Beatty & Sons.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Kulyasin, K., Alim Mutaqin, Ade Sopyan Hadi, & Fikstif Donal Lintong. (2026). THE MERAUKE–SINGAPORE CROCODILE SKIN TRADE NETWORK DURING THE DUTCH COLONIAL PERIOD. SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL, 15(1), 2163–2171. https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i1.9043