DISCURSIVE CONVERGENCE AND THE LEGITIMATION OF EDUCATIONAL CRITICISM IN INDONESIA'S DIGITAL PUBLIC SPHERE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i3.8951Keywords:
Digital Public Sphere; Educational Criticism; Discourse Network Analysis; Alternative Media; Youtube;Abstract
Despite the growing body of research on digital public discourse, limited studies have examined how educational criticism gains social legitimacy through discourse interactions using a Discourse Network Analysis (DNA) approach. The growing use of digital media has transformed the ways public opinion is formed and negotiated around social issues, including education. In Indonesia, alternative media platforms increasingly function as spaces where citizens discuss and evaluate educational policies and practices. This study examines how educational criticism gains legitimacy within Indonesia’s digital public sphere through public discourse on YouTube. Employing a critical paradigm, the research uses Discourse Network Analysis (DNA) to analyze public responses to the video Fondasi Keropos Pendidikan Indonesia published on the Malaka Project YouTube channel. A total of 1,706 comments were collected, of which 1,025 valid comments generated 2,376 statements involving 886 actors and 15 concepts. The coding process achieved a satisfactory intercoder reliability score (Krippendorff’s Alpha = 0.854). The findings reveal that educational criticism emerged as the most dominant concept within the discourse network and occupied a central position in connecting various educational issues. The distribution of discursive positions shows that 68.5% of actors expressed agreement with the criticism, while 31.5% expressed disagreement, indicating a pattern of discursive convergence rather than polarization. The actor–concept affiliation network further demonstrates that Malaka Project functions as an alternative media platform that facilitates public discussion, discursive convergence, and the social legitimization of educational criticism. This study contributes to the literature by demonstrating how discourse network structures can reveal the processes through which educational criticism becomes collectively validated within digital public spheres. These findings suggest that YouTube operates as a digital public sphere where alternative media can shape collective understanding and strengthen the legitimacy of educational criticism in contemporary Indonesia.
References
Altheide, D. L. (1972). Media Hegemony : A Failure of Perspective. 48(September 1982), 476–490.
Anbarini, R., Abdullah, A., & Sjafirah, N. A. (2023). Democracy on Social Media: The Analysis of the New Criminal Code Ratification Polemic on Twitter. Jurnal Kajian Jurnalisme, 7(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkj.v7i1.46588
Anzani, N., Rahayu, S. W., Sembiring, O. G., Parinduri, M. R. A., Sari, Y. A., Cahyani, S. R., Putra, R. A., & Athar, G. A. (2025). Analisis Indeks Pembangunan Manusia Di Indonesia Periode 2020-2023. PESHUM: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial Dan Humaniora, 4(2), 2002–2009.
Ardhiya, A., Audia, R., & Ramadani, K. L. (2022). Peran Konselor dalam Mewujudkan Pendidikan Berkualitas Menuju SDGs 2030. Proceeding of International COnference on Islamic Guidence and Counseling, 2(1), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.26811/7ev8sd36
Atton, C. (2002). Alternative Media. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446220153
Bakry, G. N., & Ardianto, F. (2025). Applying Discourse Network Analysis in Journalism Studies: Exploring Digital Transformation Response. Komunikator, 17(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.18196/jkm.v17i1.25256
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2018). Analyzing Social Network (2nd ed., Vol. 2). SAGE Publications.
Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2009). Youtube: Digital Media and Society Series. Polity Press, Cambridge.
Darmastuti, R. (2016). Media Alternatif, Masa Depan Media Indonesia. 1–18. http://repository.uksw.edu/handle/123456789/13104
Elfa Fadilah, Ari Muhammad Widyatama, Isma Ihsani, Rangga Samudra, Asep Purwo Yudi Utomo, Amilia Buana Dewi Islamy, & Rossi Galih Kesuma. (2024). Analisis Tindak Tutur Representatif Coki Pardede Dalam Tayangan Video Why So Serious? Pada Kanal Youtube Malaka Project. Mutiara : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Karya Ilmiah, 2(4), 255–277. https://doi.org/10.59059/mutiara.v2i4.1494
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from The Prison Notebooks. In Lawrence & Wishart, London, and International Publisher, New York. Lawrence & Wishart, London, and International Publisher, New York. https://dictionary.apa.org/chronological-age.
Gustomy, R., & Afala, L. M. (2019). Digital trace and critical discourse networking under Jokowi government (2014-2018). Central European Journal of International and Security Studies, 13(4), 301–317.
Habermas, J. (1991). Habermas, Junger, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, Cambridge,The MIT Press, 1991, pp. 301. In an Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society (Vol. 68).
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Kustiawan, W., Multaszam, D. I., & Restilia, T. (2023). Media dalam Pendekatan Pemikiran Postmodern atau Dekonstruksi. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(2), 297–306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7572794
Leifeld, P. (2017). Discourse network analysis: policy debates as dynamic networks. The Oxford Handbook of Political Networks, 25(July 2017). http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/121525/http://eprints.gla.ac.uk
Luik, J. (2020). Media Baru Sebuah Pengantar. In Ilmu Komunikasi. http://repository.petra.ac.id/19444/3/44_Publikasi1_06002_6825
Nasution, N. M., & Azizah, A. (2025). Analisis Wacana Kritis Pemberitaan Pemangkasan Anggaran Pendidikan dalam Isu “ Dark Indonesia ” pada Media Daring Indonesia dilakukan . Fairclough ( 1995 ) menyatakan bahwa bahasa dalam teks media. (November), 1102–1109.
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results. In Factsheets: I. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/educstion/pisa-2022-results-volume-i_53f23881-en
Papacharissi, Z. (2016). Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. In International Journal of Communication (Vol. 10). http://ijoc.org.
Pratama, B., & Illahi Ulfa, A. A. (2017). Discourse Networking Analysis sebagai Metode Penelitian Alternatif dalam Kajian Ilmu Komunikasi. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi Dan Opini Publik, 21(2), 223278.
Pribadi, F., Gema Nusantara Bakry, & Catur Nugroho. (2024). Discourse Network Analysis Of Tabungan Perumahan Rakyat (TAPERA) In Online Media Coverage. ARRUS Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(6), 729–734. https://doi.org/10.35877/soshum3485
Safitri, A. O., Yunianti, V. D., & Rostika, D. (2022). Upaya Peningkatan Pendidikan Berkualitas di Indonesia: Analisis Pencapaian Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 7096–7106.
Schäfer, M. S. (2016). Digital Public Sphere. The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc087
Sousa, S. B., Doroftei, A. O., & Araújo, H. C. (2013). Networks in Education: An Analysis of Selected Discourses. Interchange, 44(3), 311–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-014-9214-6
Sumpena, A., Arum, I. N. T., Rosdiana, N., Sugiana, D., & Bakry, G. N. (2025). ANALISIS PEMBERITAAN MEDIA PADA KASUS KEKERASAN SEKSUAL DISCOURSE NETWORK ANALYSIS terhadap orang yang terdiri atas tiga dimensi yaitu pelecehan gender ( gender harassment ), perhatian. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 8, 209–228.
.png)
