ARKA IN PHASE OJL 7 GREAT BK MOVES: A PORTRAIT OF THE INITIAL SHIFT OF BK SERVICES FROM REACTIVE TO PARTICIPATORY

Authors

  • Putra Asga Elevri Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Yadi Ruyadi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Encep Syarief Nurdin Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Asep Dahliyana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Juntika Nurihsan Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Ace Suryadi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i2.8447

Keywords:

ARKA; guidance and counseling; OJL; 7 Great BK Moves; participatory services;

Abstract

This article analyzes the application of the ARKA framework—Activities, Reflection, Conceptualization, and Application—in the on-the-job learning (OJL) phase of the 7 Great BK Jurus Program as a micro-pedagogical mechanism for guidance and counseling (BK) services. The focus of the article is directed at how the implementation of ARKA is represented in the PSKP report on the initial implementation of the 7 Great BK Skills and Guardian Teacher Program, as well as how these representations can be read as an early indication of the shift of BK services from a reactive approach to a more participatory service. This article uses a qualitative approach with a secondary document analysis design. The main source of analysis is the published PSKP report, supported by literature on BK services development, experiential learning, professional reflection, and program implementation. This article does not use raw data in the form of interview transcripts, FGDs, or internal field notes as a corpus of analysis. The results of the analysis show that ARKA can be understood as a service flow that connects activities, reflection, conceptualization, and application in BK practice. The PSKP report indicates that there are service practices that are more interactive, needs-based, reflective, and applicative, although these changes are still preliminary and uneven. Obstacles such as limited service time, infrastructure, monitoring, and legitimacy of regional facilitators continue to limit the sustainability of ARKA implementation. This article concludes that ARKA has the potential to strengthen BK development services if supported by the reflective capacity of implementers and school institutional support.

References

Chand, S. P. (2025). Methods of Data Collection in Qualitative Research: Interviews, Focus Groups, Observations, and Document Analysis. Advances in Educational Research and Evaluation, 6(1), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.25082/AERE.2025.01.001

Chatzipanagiotou, P., & Katsarou, E. (2023). Crisis Management, School Leadership in Disruptive Times and the Recovery of Schools in the Post COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Literature Review. Education Sciences, 13(2), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020118

Darling-Hammond, L., Schachner, A. C. W., Wojcikiewicz, S. K., & Flook, L. (2024). Educating Teachers to Enact The Science of Learning and Development. Applied Developmental Science, 28(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2022.2130506

Darling-Hammond, L., Wechsler, M. E., Levin, S., Leung-Gagne, M., & Tozer, S. (2022). Developing Effective Principals: What Kind of Learning Matters? https://doi.org/10.54300/641.201

Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation Matters: A Review of Research on the Influence of Implementation on Program Outcomes and the Factors Affecting Implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0

Elsayary, A. (2024). An Investigation of Teachers’ Perceptions of Using ChatGPT as a Supporting Tool for Teaching and Learning in The Digital Era. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(3), 931–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12926

Graham, S. (2022). Self-Efficacy and Language Learning – What it is and What it isn’t. The Language Learning Journal, 50(2), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2022.2045679

Hasrul, & Habsyi, I. (2024). Portrait of The Implementation of Career Guidance and Counseling Services in Junior High Schools . Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ekonomi (JUPEK), 6(1), 1–12. https://jurnal.isdikkieraha.ac.id/index.php/jupek/article/view/761

Jurs, P., Kulberga, I., Zupa, U., Titrek, O., & Špehte, E. (2023). Efficient Management of School and Teachers’ Professional Development – Challenges and Development Perspectives. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(2), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.47750/PEGEGOG.13.02.14

Maharani, R., Firman, F., & Neviyarni, N. (2025). POAC Management Model in Guidance and Counseling Services: A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Implementation in Schools. Edu Society: Journal of Education, Social Sciences and Community Service, 5(2), 771–783. https://doi.org/10.56832/edu.v5i2.1324

Megawati, Riska, Rahmi, Sarina, & Yusuf, A. (2025). Implementation of Guidance and Counseling Programs in Inclusive Education. Journal of Learning Innovation, 1(2), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.71049/P1Z24305

Muharleni, Syukur, Y., & Neviyarni. (2025). Management Strategy of Guidance and Counseling Programs in Increasing Service Effectiveness in Vocational High Schools. Journal of Social Sciences, Economics and Education, 1(2), 1–10. https://jurnal.suriaacademicpress.com/index.php/JISEP/article/view/36

Nasrudin, M., Fadillah, N. N., Rudianto, A., & Salahudin, A. (2025). Collaborative Strategies of Homeroom Teachers and BK Teachers in Guidance and Counseling Services in Elementary Schools. Reality: Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 10(2), 2934–2942. https://doi.org/10.33394/realita.v10i2.17420

Onu, P., Pradhan, A., & Mbohwa, C. (2024). Potential to Use Metaverse for Future Teaching and Learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 8893–8924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12167-9

Parry, S., & Metzger, E. (2023). Barriers to Learning for Sustainability: a Teacher Perspective. Sustainable Earth Reviews, 6(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-022-00050-3

Rusticus, S. A., Pashootan, T., & Mah, A. (2023). What are The Key Elements of a Positive Learning Environment? Perspectives from Students and Faculty. Learning Environments Research, 26(1), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09410-4

Ryser, G. R. (2021). Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches to Assessment. In Identifying Gifted Students. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003235682-2

Sadrizadeh, S., Yao, R., Yuan, F., Awbi, H., Bahnfleth, W., Bi, Y., Cao, G., Croitoru, C., de Dear, R., Haghighat, F., Kumar, P., Malayeri, M., Nasiri, F., Ruud, M., Sadeghian, P., Wargocki, P., Xiong, J., Yu, W., & Li, B. (2022). Indoor Air Quality and Health in Schools: A Critical Review for Developing The Roadmap for The Future School Environment. Journal of Building Engineering, 57, 104908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104908

Sainuddin, S., Subali, B., Jailani, & Elvira, M. (2022). The Development and Validation Prospective Mathematics Teachers Holistic Assessment Tools. Ingénierie Des Systèmes d Information, 27(2), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.18280/isi.270201

Soliha, N., Faudziah, R., Saleh, R., Fadilla, R., & Farida, N. A. (2025). Implementation of Guidance and Counseling Services at SMPN 2 Karawang. Journal of Elementary and Early Childhood Teacher Education, 2(3), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.70134/PEDASUD.V2I3.880

Supriadin, & Maghfirah, L. (2026). Reorientation of Guidance and Counseling Services in Junior High School in Responding to Student Development Needs. Journal of Educational Innovation and Transformation, 1(1), 40–56. https://ejurnal.cvauratun.com/index.php/JurnalInovasidanTransformasiPend/article/view/4

Totino, L., & Kessler, A. (2024). “Why did we do that?” A Systematic Approach to Tracking Decisions in the Design and Iteration of Learning Experiences. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design. https://doi.org/10.59668/1269.15630

Downloads

Published

2026-06-26

How to Cite

Elevri, P. A., Ruyadi, Y., Nurdin, E. S., Dahliyana, A., Nurihsan, J., & Suryadi, A. (2026). ARKA IN PHASE OJL 7 GREAT BK MOVES: A PORTRAIT OF THE INITIAL SHIFT OF BK SERVICES FROM REACTIVE TO PARTICIPATORY. SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL, 15(2), 2240–2253. https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i2.8447