FIFTH GRADE STUDENTS’ SCIENCE LITERACY PROFILE AS A BASIS FOR DEVELOPING EDUCATIONAL GAMES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i2.8244Keywords:
educational games, elementary school, literacy profile, science learning, science literacyAbstract
Scientific literacy is a fundamental skill that must be developed from elementary school level so that students are able to understand and solve problems based on scientific evidence. This study aims to describe the profile of scientific literacy, identify factors causing low achievement, and formulate recommendations. Using a qualitative case study approach at Kalibawang Public Elementary School, data were collected through questionnaires, observations, and interviews with 30 fifth-grade students and one teacher selected by purposive sampling, and analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña. The results show that the profile of students' scientific literacy is in the sufficient category (average 3.16) with gaps between aspects: scientific responsibility competency is the highest (3.29), while science career information (2.85) and environmental responsibility (2.86) are the lowest. Low scientific literacy is caused by three interlocking factors: teachers' limitations in developing textbook-based assessment instruments, the lack of interactive media, and the scarcity of project-based learning due to the dominance of the transmissive pattern. The implication is that teacher training is needed to develop contextual digital instruments and media, allocate time for integrated STEM projects, school policies that support innovative models, and the development of mission-based educational games to improve scientific literacy sustainably.
References
Adah Miller, E., Li, T., Chen, I.-C., Krajcik, J., & Codere Kelly, S. (2025). Designing for and investigating elementary students’ cognitive flexibility, science, and literacy achievement in project-based science learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 7(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-025-00131-1
Almeida, F., & Simoes, J. (2019). The role of serious games, gamification and industry 4.0 tools in the education 4.0 paradigm. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(2), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.554469
Anggraeni, R. E., & Suratno. (2021). The analysis of the development of the 5E-STEAM learning model to improve critical thinking skills in natural science lesson. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1832(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1832/1/012050
Cheng, She, H. C., & Annetta, L. A. (2015). Game immersion experience: Its hierarchical structure and impact on game-based science learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 232–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12066
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design. In Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802533
Damarjati, S., & Miatun, A. (2021). Pengembangan Game Edukasi Berbasis Android sebagai Media Pembelajaran Berorientasi pada Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis. ANARGYA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.24176/anargya.v4i2.6442
Dwiyanti, A., Salim, H., & Hendriawan, D. (2025). Analisis Profil Kemampuan Literasi Sains dan Sikap Ilmiah Siswa Kelas IV SD Negeri Seroja Pada Pelajaran IPA. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Flobamorata, 6(4), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.51494/jpdf.v6i4.2628
Forawi, S. A. (2016). Standard-based science education and critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 20, 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.02.005
Fortus, D., Lin, J., Neumann, K., & Sadler, T. D. (2022). The role of affect in science literacy for all. International Journal of Science Education ISSN:, 44(4), 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2036384
García-Carmona, A., Muñoz-Franco, G., Criado, A. M., & Cruz-Guzmán, M. (2024). Validation of an instrument for assessing basic science process skills in initial elementary teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 46(4), 362–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2232936
Handayani, L. L. (2025). Enhancing Science Learning Experience and Social Attitudes through Vygotsky’s Social Reconstruction Model with Scaffolding. International Journal of Elementary Education, 9(3), 410–420. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v9i3.100759
Jufri, A. W., Setiadi, D., & Sripatmi. (2016). Scientific reasoning ability of prospective student teacher in the excellence program of mathematics and science teacher education in University of Mataram. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5792
Juniarso, T., & Sulistyawati, I. (2022). The effect of self efficacy on scientific literacy: A correlation study in elementary school students. Elementary School: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Ke-SD-An, 9(1), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.31316/esjurnal.v9i1.2203
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733
Lehesvuori, S., Ramnarain, U., & Viiri, J. (2018). Challenging Transmission Modes of Teaching in Science Classrooms: Enhancing Learner-Centredness through Dialogicity. Research in Science Education, 48(5), 1049–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9598-7
Lestari, R. & Rohmani. (2025). Trends in the Development of Game-Based Science Learning Research in Elementary Schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 58(2), 349–364. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v58i2.84778
Li, Y., & Guo, M. (2021). Scientific Literacy in Communicating Science and Socio-Scientific Issues: Prospects and Challenges. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(November). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.758000
Lindner, J. R., & Lindner, N. J. (2024). Interpreting Likert-type Scales , Summated Scales , Unidimensional Scales , and Attitudinal Scales: I neither Agree nor Disagree , Likert or Not. Advancements in Agricultural Development, 5(2), 152–163.
Maghfiroh, W., & Muttaqin, A. I. (2025). The Relevance of Collaborative Learning in the Perspective of Lev Vygotsky’s Social Constructivism: A Literature Review. Journal of Islamic Education Research, 6(4), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.35719/jier.v6i4.518
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publication.
Nicolás-Castellano, C., Limiñana, R., Menargues, A., Rosa-Cintas, S., & Martínez-Torregrosa, J. (2023). Sustainable Change in Primary Science Education: From Transmissive to Guided Inquiry-Based Teaching. Sustainability, 15(15), 11710. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511710
OECD. (2015). PISA 2015 Draft Mathematics Framework. Columbia University.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. In OECD Publishing: I.
OECD. (2025). PISA 2025 Science Framework. OECD Publishing. https://pisa-framework.oecd.org/science-2025/
Pinasti, R., & Pratiwi, K. S. (2025). Interactive Digital Media Based on Ispring Suite 11 to Improve Science Literacy of Elementary School Students. JST (Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi), 14(2), 329–338. https://doi.org/10.23887/jst-undiksha.v14i2.75772
Prensky, M. (2021). Digital Game-based Learning. ACM Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 621–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79143-8_108
Rahmaniati, R., Bulkani, Astuti, A. D., & Amalia, C. (2025). The Development of the ‘Mahaga’ Digital Authentic Assessment Instrument Based on the Project-Based STEM Approach to Enhance Elementary School Students’ Scientific Literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(12), 1059–1070. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i12.13551
Roy, G., Sikder, S., & Danaia, L. (2025). Adopting scientific literacy in early years from empirical studies on formal education: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of STEM Education, 12(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-025-00547-1
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Soe, H. Y., Zhang, D., Fu, D., & Cui, Y. (2025). How an autonomy-supportive learning environment influences students’ achievements in science and mathematics. Social Psychology of Education, 28(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09970-8
Suhardi, M., Sholihah, M., & Rohmani. (2025). Research Development Trends in Project Based Learning (PjBL) Learning Models in Science Learning in Elementary Schools: Bibliometric Analysis. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v8i1.84683
Supriyaddin, S., Prayudi, A., & Putra, A. (2023). Pengembangan Game Edukatif Literasi Numerasi Budaya Lokal Dompu Berbasis Android. Ainara Journal (Jurnal Penelitian Dan PKM Bidang Ilmu Pendidikan), 4(3), 130–135. https://doi.org/10.54371/ainj.v4i3.282
Suryanti, S., Nursalim, M., Choirunnisa, N. L., & Yuliana, I. (2024). STEAM-Project-Based Learning: A Catalyst for Elementary School Students’ Scientific Literacy Skills. European Journal of Educational Research, volume–13–2024(volume–13–issue–1–january–2024), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.1.1
Syofyan, H., Fadli, M. R., & Pappachan, P. (2025). Determinant Factors of Scientific Literacy in Elementary School Science Learning. Lnternational Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2025.400
Thangeda, A., & Baratiseng, B. (2016). Education for Sustainability: Quality Education Is A Necessity inModern Day. How Far do the Educational Institutions FacilitateQuality Education? Journal of Education and Practice, 7(2), 9–17.
Topîrceanu, A. (2017). Gamified learning: A role-playing approach to increase student in-class motivation. Procedia Computer Science, 112, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.017
Uus, T., Hendrawati, S., & Rustaman, A. (2017). Membangun literasi sains peserta didik. Humaniora.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Yuliana, I., Jatmiko, B., Widodo, W., & Suryanti, S. (2025). A bibliometric mapping on scientific literacy in primary education (2000 – 2024). Perspectives of Science and Education, 76(4), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2025.4.13
Yustin, D. L., & Wiyarsi, A. (2019). Students’ chemical literacy: A study in chemical bonding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1397(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1397/1/012036





.png)













