Pancasila Ethics In The Shadow Of Political Pragmatism: A Strategy For Transforming A Party System With Integrity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i2.8230Keywords:
Pancasila Ethics, Integrity, Political Pragmatism, Party SystemAbstract
This study aims to analyze the role of Pancasila ethics in addressing political
pragmatism within Indonesia’s party system and to formulate transformation
strategies that can foster a party system characterized by integrity. In Indonesia’s
political system, political pragmatism often leads to the neglect of Pancasila
values, resulting in political practices lacking integrity, such as transactional
politics and corruption. This study employs a qualitative approach with literature
analysis to explore the relationship between Pancasila values and the pragmatic
political practices occurring in Indonesia. The research findings indicate that to
address political pragmatism, political parties in Indonesia need to implement
transformation strategies that include character education for party leaders, the
application of transparency and accountability in party management, the
empowerment of internal democracy, and the strengthening of integrity in the
electoral process. This study concludes that the consistent application of
Pancasila values in the policies and practices of political parties can foster a party
system that is more integrity-driven and accountable to the people.
References
Abas, A. (2017). The Urgency of Ethics in Governance. JPSI (Journal of Public Sector Innovations), 1(2), 79. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpsi.v1n2.p79-89
Alim, A. S., Salmawati, S., & Rahmawati, D. E. (2021). Political Ethics Regarding Corrupt Behavior in Indonesia (Case Study of the Malang City Regional Representative Council). Noken Journal: Social Sciences, 7(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.33506/jn.v7i1.1392
Amanah, S., & Sa`adati, T. I. (2021). Political Transformation: The Role of Political Parties in Improving Education and Awareness of Pluralism in the 2019 Kediri City Election. Indonesian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 305–318. https://ejournal.uit-lirboyo.ac.id/index.php/IJHSS
Andriyansyah, M. F. (2020). The Role of Local Political Parties in the Implementation of Special Autonomy in Aceh. Yurispruden, 3(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v3i1.4862
Ayuningsih, N., & Aulia, V. (2024). Political Parties and Interest Representation: An Analysis of the Role of Parties in Representing Diverse Social Groups. Journal …, 1(3), 558–569. https://ejurnal.kampusakademik.co.id/index.php/jmia/article/view/1572%0Ahttps://ejurnal.kampusakademik.co.id/index.php/jmia/article/download/1572/1451
Barokah, F., Maryanah, T., Darmastuti, A., & Hertanto, H. (2022). Political Disruption. Nakhoda: Journal of Public Administration, 21(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.35967/njip.v21i1.273
Busahwi, A. H. (2021). Political Problems of the Coalition Cabinet; From Conflicts of Interest to Internal Party Conflicts Abd Hannan, Busahwi State Islamic Institute of Madura Email: Introduction In recent months, particularly following the widespread rumors of the entry of the Amanat Nas Party. Journal of Social Community, 6(14), 49–69.
Cesilia Fransiska H Rajagukguk, Dian Novita Ayudea, & Encik Mutia Rama Ananda. (2024). The Existence of Pancasila as the Foundation of the Indonesian State. Jurnal Bintang Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(3), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.55606/jubpi.v2i3.3070
Ekowati, E. Y. (2019). Political Pragmatism: Between Coalitions, Nominations, and Single Candidates in Regional Elections. Jurnal Transformative, 5(1), 16–37. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/230239078.pdf
Erlina, F. (2023). The Dynamics of the Electoral System and the Democratization of Political Parties in Indonesia Post-Reform. Kosmik Hukum, 23(2), 200. https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v23i3.16640
Fadhil, M., Hudi, I., Rama Sari, P., Sofiantini, A., Desilva Sari, A., Kayla Amartha, D., & Dini Putri, R. (2024). Implementation of Pancasila Values in Political Dynamics. 2(1). https://journal.wiyatapublisher.or.id/index.php/kybernology
Haliim, W. (2020). Issues in Grant and Social Assistance Policies Funded by the Regional Budget: The Relationship Between Corruption and Leadership Power, and Elite Behavior. Inovasi, 17(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.33626/inovasi.v17i1.136
Hadiz, V., Hadiz, V. R., & Robison, R. (2004). Reorganising power in Indonesia: The politics of oligarchy in an age of markets. Routledge.
Hamdi, A. F., Sakka, R., Islam, U., & Alauddin, N. (2024). The role of political party cadre development in Makassar in determining legislative candidates from the perspective of Islamic politics. 5(3), 732–753.
Himawan, M. N., Linggi, I. T., Elizabeth, P., Saputra, M. F., & Jhon, B. (2024). Grounding Pancasila Values as Political Ethics: Toward an Advanced and Just Pancasila Democracy. 1(1), 1–9.
Hukum, J., & Ummah, K. (2017). Khaira Ummah Law Journal Vol. 12, No. 4, December 2017: Public Policy on Agricultural Land Protection... (Ihsan Wira Senjaya). 12(4), 825–832.
Jazuli, A. S. (2015). The Effectiveness of the Large Political Party Coalition in the 2012 Jakarta Regional Election. Jurnal Transformative, 1(1), 55–68. https://transformative.ub.ac.id/index.php/jtr/article/view/125
Khalib Gadafi, & Sasmi Nelwati. (2024). The Impact of Political Dynasties on the Pancasila Democratic Culture in Indonesia. Journal of Innovation in Education, 2(3), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.59841/inoved.v2i3.1384
Lubis, S. H., Annisa, F., Rahmadani, D. Y., & Usiono, U. (2024). The Application of Pancasila as an Ethical System Among the Community. JERUMI: Journal of Education, Religion, Humanities, and Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(1), 173–176. https://doi.org/10.57235/jerumi.v2i1.1716
Mietzner, M. (2007). Party financing in post-Soeharto Indonesia: between state subsidies and political corruption. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 238-263.
Machi, L. A., & McEvoy, B. T. (2009). The literature review: Six steps to success.
Nadir, N., & Wardani, W. Y. (2019). Building Political Education Within the Framework of Pancasila Democracy and Deliberative Democracy. The Journal of Society & Media, 3(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsm.v3n1.p126-141
Nahdi, K. (2014). The Pseudo-Pragmatism of Democracy and the Challenges of Character Education; The Phenomenon of Transactional Politics in the 2014 Legislative Elections in East Lombok. Political Review, 04(2), 192–206. http://eprints.hamzanwadi.ac.id/728/1/03c Jurnal_3_Pseudo-Pragmatism of Democracy and Obstacles to Character Education: The Phenomenon of Political Transactions_opt.pdf
Nugraheni, S. D., Angel, V., Puspita, V. H., Santi, W. N., & Fitriono, R. A. (2023). Pancasila as an Ethical System. JETISH: Journal of Education Technology, Information, Social Sciences, and Health, 1(2), 196–200. https://doi.org/10.57235/jetish.v1i2.126
Putra, A. (2024). (Strengthening the Integrity and Accountability of Political Parties Through the Expansion of Applicants for Dissolution at the Constitutional Court). 54.
Rosidi, R. (2017). Political Communication Strategies and the Culture of Transparency in Political Parties. Journal of Politics and Governance, Scientific Journal of the Political Science Program, 2(1), 78–100. https://doi.org/10.55745/jpp.v2i1.15
Soeprapto, S. (2013). Muhammad Hatta’s Concept of the Implementation of Pancasila from the Perspective of Pancasila Ethics. Jurnal Fisapat, 23(2), 100–116.
Sumartono, S. (2018). Political Culture in a Pragmatic Society. LUGAS Journal of Communication, 2(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.31334/jl.v2i1.119
Susila Wibawa, K. C. (2019). Participatory Oversight to Achieve Good Governance in the Conduct of Simultaneous General Elections in Indonesia. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 2(4), 615–628. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i4.615-628
Ufen, A. (2008). Political party and party system institutionalization in Southeast Asia: lessons for democratic consolidation in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Thailand. Pacific Review, 21(3), 327–350.
.png)
