MANAGING TEACHERS' PEDAGOGICAL COMPETENCE DEVELOPMENT IN PUBLIC JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS

Authors

  • Yulce Hambali Master of Educational Management, Postgraduate Program, Pattimura University, Ambon, Indonesia
  • Rudolf Kempa Master of Educational Management, Postgraduate Program, Pattimura University, Ambon, Indonesia
  • Tanwey Gerson Ratumanan Master of Educational Management, Postgraduate Program, Pattimura University, Ambon, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i2.8180

Keywords:

pedagogical competence; teacher professional development; educational management; academic supervision; junior high school;

Abstract

This study aims to describe the management of teachers' pedagogical competence development in public junior high schools in Baguala District, Ambon City. The study focuses on planning, implementation, evaluation, and supporting and inhibiting factors in three schools: SMP Negeri 9 Ambon, SMP Negeri 12 Ambon, and SMP Negeri 13 Ambon. A qualitative descriptive approach with a multisite case study design was used. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, non-participant observation, and documentation involving principals, vice principals for curriculum, and subject teachers. The data were analyzed through data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing, while validity was strengthened through source, technique, and theoretical triangulation. The findings show that planning was generally systematic but differed across schools. SMP Negeri 9 Ambon emphasized school-based management planning through work meetings and curriculum programs; SMP Negeri 12 Ambon emphasized professional learning community planning through school-based MGMP and professional discussions; and SMP Negeri 13 Ambon emphasized reflective and evidence-based planning using academic supervision results. Implementation was carried out through workshops, MGMP activities, internal training on the Merdeka Curriculum, academic supervision, and technology-based learning media training. Evaluation was conducted through supervision, curriculum evaluation meetings, reflective discussions, and analysis of learning outcomes. The main supporting factors were principal support, active MGMP activities, teacher participation, and regular supervision, while the main obstacles were limited facilities, limited time, administrative workload, and training budget constraints. The study concludes that integrated managerial, collaborative, and reflective approaches are needed to strengthen sustainable pedagogical competence development.

References

Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007

Bush, T. (2011). Theories of educational leadership and management (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Empowered educators: How high-performing systems shape teaching quality around the world. Jossey-Bass.

Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2015). Best practices in teachers' professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society & Education, 7(3), 252-263. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i3.515

Fullan, M. (2014). The principal: Three keys to maximizing impact. Jossey-Bass.

Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2014). Supervision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach (9th ed.). Pearson Education.

Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512

Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111116699

Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077

OECD. (2019). Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners: TALIS 2018 results (Vol. 1). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en

Republic of Indonesia. (2005). Law Number 14 of 2005 concerning Teachers and Lecturers.

Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635-674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509

Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8

Timperley, H. (2011). Realizing the power of professional learning. Open University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-26

How to Cite

Hambali, Y., Kempa, R., & Ratumanan, T. G. (2026). MANAGING TEACHERS’ PEDAGOGICAL COMPETENCE DEVELOPMENT IN PUBLIC JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS. SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL, 15(2), 2193–2201. https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i2.8180