THE INFLUENCE OF PRINCIPAL LEADERSHIP, INNOVATIVE ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE, AND TEACHER WORK MOTIVATION ON TEACHER PERFORMANCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i1.7761Keywords:
educational management; educational leadership; quality of education;Abstract
This inquiry is directed toward evaluating the magnitude of influenceexerted by three key predictors Principal Leadership, InnovativeOrganizational Culture, and Work Motivation upon Teacher Performance atSDN 012 Balikpapan Timur and SDIT Darun Najah. Adopting a quantitative approach, this research utilized a census technique, wherein theentire population of 46 teachers served as a saturated sample. Data acquisition relied on Likert-scale questionnaires, while hypothesisverification was conducted utilizing Multiple Linear Regression analysis. Despite initial normality assessments indicating a non-normal distribution (p < 0.001), the analytical process proceeded as the model successfullysatisfied alternative classical assumption prerequisites, specifically validity, reliability, multicollinearity, and heteroscedasticity. The empirical findingsconfirm that, when examined partially, none of the three independentvariables exert a substantial impact on teacher performance; this iscorroborated by probability values exceeding the 0.05 threshold for eachvariable (X1=0.214; X2=0.149; X3=0.364). Furthermore, the coefficient ofdetermination reveals that only 29.8% of the variability in TeacherPerformance is attributable to the combination of these independentvariables. Consequently, the remaining majority proportion (70.2%) stemsfrom external determinants falling outside the scope of this analyticalframework. It is concluded that within the elementary school context of thisregion, these specific factors do not constitute the primary drivers forenhancing teacher performance.
References
Policy Institute.
Dewi, L. A., Sumarni, dan Setiawan, W. J. (2025). Pengaruh kepemimpinan terhadap kinerja guru dengan budaya organisasi sebagai variabel intervening pada SMP Negeri 12 Sungai Penuh. RISOMA: Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan, 3(3), 176–193. https://www.ajhssr.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/S24809205216.pdf
Duckworth, A. (2016). Grit: The power of passion and perseverance. Scribner.
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work. John Wiley & Sons.
Leithwood, K., dan Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112–129.
Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational behavior: An evidence-based approach (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. ASCD.
OECD. (2024). OECD skills outlook 2024. OECD Publishing.
Rosmawati. (2020). Pengaruh disiplin dan profesionalisme guru terhadap kinerja guru. Journal of Education Research, 1(3), 200–205. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jptk/article/view/8931
Ryan, R. M., dan Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian kombinasi (mixed methods). Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (Ed. 2). Alfabeta
.png)
