Good Governance in Regional Official Vehicle Management: An Islamic Education Management Perspective

Ahmad Hidir Amin; Ibnu Elmi A. S. Pelu

doi:10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i1.7688

Authors

Ahmad Hidir Amin Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya
Ibnu Elmi A. S. Pelu Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i1.7688

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of good governance principles in the management of official vehicles as part of Regional Property (BMD) and examine it from the perspective of Islamic Education Management (MPI). The study uses a qualitative approach with a case study design through in-depth interviews, document analysis, and administrative observation of the management of official vehicles in the local government environment. The results show that of the 241 active vehicles, 214 (88.8%) have a valid user decree (SK), while 27 (11.2%) have not been renewed due to job rotation dynamics. These findings indicate that administrative legality has been relatively fulfilled, but consistency in administrative accountability has not been fully achieved. The ongoing governance practices are still dominated by procedural compliance (rule-based compliance) and are not yet fully oriented towards performance-based accountability. From an MPI perspective, public asset management is not only understood as regulatory compliance, but as a practice of stewardship that demands integrity, responsibility, and public interest. This study emphasizes that strengthening regional asset governance requires the integration of digital-based administrative system reforms, bureaucratic capacity building, and the internalization of ethical-spiritual values in organizational practices. Conceptually, this study contributes to the development of an integrative approach between good governance and Islamic Education Management values in public asset governance.

References

Ahn, T., & Brewer, G. A. (2023). Bureaucratic capacity and public service performance: A quantitative analysis across OECD countries. American Review of Public Administration, 53(4), 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740221112345

Al-Ghazali. (1993). Al-Mustashfa min ‘Ilm al-Usul. Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Andrews, M. (2013). The limits of institutional reform in development: Changing rules for realistic solutions. Cambridge University Press.

Azra, A. (2012). Pendidikan Islam: Tradisi dan modernisasi di tengah tantangan milenium III. Kencana.

Azra, A. (2019). Pendidikan Islam: Tradisi dan modernisasi di tengah tantangan global. Kencana.

Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E., & Schillemans, T. (2014). The Oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford University Press.

Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E., Schillemans, T., & (Eds.). (2014). The Oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford University Press.

Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2021). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 81(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13180

Cepiku, D., Giordano, F., & Mastrodascio, M. (2021a). Administrative capacity and public sector reform: Evidence from European governments. Public Management Review, 23(11), 1635–1652. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1764083

Cepiku, D., Giordano, F., & Mastrodascio, M. (2021b). Public sector reforms and governance capacity: A systematic review. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 87(3), 483–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852319873647

Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2022). Public sector reforms and governance capacity: Insights from Scandinavian countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 88(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211012345

Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is governance? Governance, 26(3), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12035

Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2015). A government that worked better and cost less? Evaluating three decades of reform and change in UK central government. Oxford University Press.

Kementerian Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Pedoman Pengelolaan Barang Milik Daerah. Kementerian Dalam Negeri RI.

Kementerian Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 47 Tahun 2018 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Pedoman Pengelolaan Barang Milik Daerah. Kementerian Dalam Negeri RI.

Khaldun, I. (2005). The Muqaddimah: An introduction to history (F. Rosenthal, Trans.). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1377).

Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2020a). E-government and public trust: The mediating role of transparency. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101476

Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2020b). Government transparency and public trust: A cross-national analysis. Public Administration Review, 80(4), 645–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13174

Lee, K., & Lee, Y. (2024). Performance information systems and accountability in local governments: Evidence from comparative case studies. Public Administration Review, 84(2), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13579

Lodge, M., & Wegrich, K. (2021). Managing regulation and governance. Palgrave Macmillan.

Margetts, H., & Dunleavy, P. (2013a). The second wave of digital-era governance: A quasi-paradigm for government on the Web. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 371(1987), 20120382. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0382

Margetts, H., & Dunleavy, P. (2013b). The second wave of digital-era governance. Oxford University Press.

Meijer, A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2021a). Responsible governance in the digital era: A systematic literature review. Public Management Review, 23(9), 1323–1344.

Meijer, A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2021b). Transparency and trust in government: A relational perspective. Public Administration, 99(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12688

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2023). Strengthening public sector performance through evidence-based governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(3), 482–500. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muad016

OECD. (2020a). Government at a glance 2020. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1c258f55-en

OECD. (2020b). OECD public governance reviews: Risk management and internal control in public administration. OECD Publishing.

Osborne, S. P. (2010). The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Routledge.

Overman, S., & Schillemans, T. (2022). Toward a public administration theory of accountability. Public Administration Review, 82(2), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13425

Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2000). Governance, politics and the state. Macmillan Press.

Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis—Into the age of austerity (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Power, M. (2007). Organized uncertainty: Designing a world of risk management. Oxford University Press.

Qomar, M. (2007). Manajemen pendidikan Islam. Erlangga.

Qomar, M. (2015). Strategi pendidikan Islam. Erlangga.

Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x

Rosyada, D. (2017). Madrasah dan profesionalisme guru dalam arus dinamika pendidikan Islam di Indonesia. Kencana.

Rosyada, D. (2021). Reformasi pendidikan Islam. Kencana.

Schillemans, T., & Busuioc, M. (2015a). Predicting public sector accountability: From agency drift to forum drift. Public Administration Review, 75(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12318

Schillemans, T., & Busuioc, M. (2015b). Predicting public sector accountability: From agency drift to forum drift. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu024

Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2016). Theories of democratic network governance. Palgrave Macmilla.

UNDP. (1997). Governance for sustainable human development. United Nations Development Programme.

van de Walle, S., & Zenker, S. (2023). Digital governance and trust in local government e-services. Government Information Quarterly, 40(3), 101781.

Willems, T., & Van Dooren, W. (2021). Performance-based accountability in the public sector. Governance, 34(3), 741–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12523

World Bank. (1992). Governance and development. World Bank.

World Bank. (2017). Enhancing government effectiveness and transparency: The fight against corruption. World Bank Publications.

Yesilkagit, K., & van Thiel, S. (2022). Institutional capacity and public sector performance: The role of monitoring and evaluation. Public Administration Review, 82(3), 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13425

Zhang, Y., & Chen, X. (2023). Risk-based governance in public administration: Integrating prevention and performance. Public Management Review, 25(4), 612–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.2015654

Zhang, Z., & Yang, Q. (2023). Transparency and citizen engagement in governance: Evidence from Asia-Pacific local governments. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 45(3), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2022.2156784