ANALYSIS OF THE LIMITS OF AUTHORITY OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS IN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS IN ISSUING VISUM ET REPERTUM BASED ON LAW NO. 17 OF 2023 ON HEALTH

Authors

  • Jaya Ashari Universitas Bengkulu
  • Herlita Eryke Universitas Bengkulu
  • Marlis Tarmizi Universitas Bengkulu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i1.7621

Keywords:

Visum et Repertum; Authority of General Practitioners; Community Health Centers; Law 17of 2023, Health Law;

Abstract

Visum et Repertum (Visum et Repertum) plays a crucial role in the criminal evidence process, but the authority of general practitioners in community health centers (Puskesmas) to issue them still creates legal uncertainty, especially after the enactment of Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health. This study aims to analyze the limitations of general practitioners' authority in preparing visums based on provisions of health law and state administrative law. The research method used is normative juridical, with a statutory, conceptual, and doctrinal approach, accompanied by an analysis of forensic medicine literature and medical professional regulations. The results indicate that Law 17 of 2023 does not explicitly regulate the authority of general practitioners in forensic procedures. Therefore, visums can only be issued if they comply with competency, professional standards, and the medical code of ethics. The study also found a gap between the needs of law enforcement in the regions and the limited forensic personnel, resulting in general practitioners still being required to issue visums despite inadequate normative basis. The study's conclusions emphasize the need for more comprehensive derivative regulations to provide legal certainty, improve the quality of visums, and protect doctors from legal risks.

 

References

Arfandi, D. (2017). Visum et repertum: Tatalaksana dan teknik pembuatan. Fakultas Kedokteran Riau.

Dwiyanto, A. (2018). Manajemen pelayanan publik. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Hadjon, P. M., et al. (2010). Hukum administrasi dan good governance. Universitas Trisakti.

Hamzah, M., & Karim, A. (2022). Professional competence and authority in issuing visum et repertum. Indonesian Journal of Forensic Medicine, 5(1), 27–30.

Hidayat, R., & Sari, N. (2020). Tantangan dokter umum dalam pelayanan medikolegal di fasilitas kesehatan primer. Jurnal Hukum & Kesehatan, 5(2), 145–158.

Ikatan Dokter Indonesia. (2012). Kode etik kedokteran Indonesia (KODEKI). IDI.

Kinandani, A., & Layang, P. (2023). Kualitas visum et repertum pada fasilitas pelayanan kesehatan primer di Indonesia. Journal of Forensic Medical Studies, 12(1), 22–33.

Lestari, D. (2021). Peran dokumen visum et repertum dalam sistem pembuktian pidana. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 51(3), 402–417.

Lubis, M. (2024). Kedudukan visum et repertum dalam proses peradilan pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Yustisia Indonesia, 13(1), 55–70.

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Pengantar ilmu hukum. Kencana.

Moeljatno. (2015). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Rineka Cipta.

Putra, Y. (2022). Akurasi dokumentasi medis dan tantangan chain of custody dalam pemeriksaan forensik klinis. Jurnal Kesehatan Forensik, 4(2), 119–131.

Ridwan HR. (2020). Hukum administrasi negara. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Rohmawati, F. (2021). Analisis kepatuhan perawat mandiri terhadap perizinan praktik. Jurnal Kebijakan Kesehatan Indonesia, 10(2), 134–145.

Saukko, P., & Knight, B. (2016). Knight’s forensic pathology. CRC Press.

Setiawan, D. A. (2021). Kompetensi dokter umum dalam penyusunan visum et repertum di fasilitas pelayanan kesehatan tingkat pertama. Jurnal Kedokteran Forensik Indonesia, 23(1), 45–52.

Suade, N. S., et al. (2025). Kewenangan dokter puskesmas dalam visum et repertum sebagai bukti dalam pengadilan kasus tindakan kekerasan seksual. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(7).

Sutomo, B., & Widodo, S. (2018). Kualitas visum et repertum dalam mendukung pembuktian tindak pidana. Jurnal Kedokteran Forensik Indonesia, 20(2), 85–92.

Triwibowo, W. (2016). Pengantar hukum kesehatan Indonesia. Kencana.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana.

Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan.

Undang-Undang Nomor 29 Tahun 2004 tentang Praktik Kedokteran.

Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 tentang Kesehatan.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Ashari, J., Eryke, H., & Tarmizi , M. (2026). ANALYSIS OF THE LIMITS OF AUTHORITY OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS IN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS IN ISSUING VISUM ET REPERTUM BASED ON LAW NO. 17 OF 2023 ON HEALTH. SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL, 15(1), 1801–1812. https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i1.7621