POLITICAL MOBILIZATION OF CIGARETTE FACTORY WORKERS IN THE 2024 KUDUS REGIONAL ELECTION: PATRON-CLIENT DYNAMICS AND ELECTORAL PRAGMATISM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i1.7589Keywords:
Clientelism, Cigarette Factory Workers, Electoral Pragmatism, Kudus Regional Election, Patron-Client Relations, Political MobilizationAbstract
Cigarette factory workers in Kudus Regency (predominantly women) occupy a distinctive socio-economic position shaped by enduring stereotypes that frame them as diligent, compliant, and low-cost labor. In the context of regional head elections (Pilkada), this workforce constitutes a sizable and strategically important electoral constituency. Their numerical concentration makes them a highly contested voting bloc, prompting candidate pairs to devise targeted mobilization strategies. This study examines the political mobilization of cigarette factory workers during the 2024 Regional Head Election in Kudus. Mobilization was conducted through the hierarchical network of the Federasi Serikat Pekerja Rokok, Tembakau, Makanan, dan Minuman Serikat Pekerja Seluruh Indonesia (FSP RTMM-SPSI), extending from union leaders to factory-level foremen (mandor) who acted as intermediaries between political elites and rank-and-file workers. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, the research analyzes patron–client relations linking candidate pairs, union officials, and workers, with particular attention to the distribution of material incentives as instruments of electoral consolidation. The findings reveal a prevailing political pragmatism in Kudus that normalizes vote-buying practices, despite their potential to inflate campaign expenditures and reinforce corruption. The study highlights the persistence of clientelistic mobilization within Indonesia’s local democratic framework.
References
Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for Sale: Elections, Clientelism, and the State in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (2016). Patronage and Clientelism in Indonesian Electoral Politics. In E. Aspinall & M. Sukmajati (Eds.), Electoral Dynamics in Indonesia: Money Politics, Patronage and Clientelism at the Grassroots (pp. 1–37). NUS Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1xxzz2.7
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc
Caraway, T.L. (2023). Organized Labor in Southeast Asia. Cambridge University Press.
Caraway, T. L., & Ford, M. (2020). Labor and Politics in Indonesia. Cambridge University Press.
Carnes, Matthew E. (2009). Institutionalizing Inequality: The Political Origins of Labor Codes in Latin America. Working Paper #363, Georgetown University.
Huntington, Samuel P., & Joan Nelson, (1994). Partisipasi Politik di Negara Berkembang. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Maczak, A. (2018). Unequal Friendship The Patron-Client Relationship in Historical Perspective. Development in Vietnam. Frankfurt: Peter Lang GmbH.
Muhtadi, Burhanudin. (2013). Politik Uang dan Dinamika Elektoral di Indonesia: Sebuah Kajian Awal Interaksi Antara Party-Id Dan Patron-Klien. Jurnal Penelitian Politik. 10(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v10i1.217
Nastain, Muhammad, & Catur Nugroho. (2022). Relasi Kuasa dan Suara: Politik Patron Klien Pada Pilkada Langsung di Kabupaten Grobogan 2020. Jurnal Politika, 13(1), 167-184. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.13.1.2022.167-184
Ramadhan, M.N. and Oley, J.D.B. (2019) Klientelisme sebagai Perilaku Koruptif dan Demokrasi Banal, Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 5(1), 169-180. doi:10.32697/integritas.v5i1.379
Scott, J. C. (1972). Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia. The American Political Science Review, 66(1), 91-113. https://doi.org/10.2307/1959280
Subadi, T. (2008). Sosiologi. Surakarta: FKIP UMS.
Sugiyono. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suyanto, B. (2005). Metode Penelitian Sosial. Jakarata: Kencana Prenanda Media.
Widoyoko, J. D. (2018) Politik, Patronase dan Pengadaan; Studi Kasus Korupsi Proyek Wisma Atlet. Integritas, 4(2), 1-23.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Yasih, Diatyka Widya Permata & Rakhmani, Inaya. (2024). Maintaining Life Under Neoliberal Capitalism: A Case Study of Muslimah Laborers in Solo Raya. Studia Islamika, 31(3), pp. 511-535. DOI: 10.36712/sdi.v31i3.40458.
Neureiter, Michael. (2013). Organized Labor and Democratization in Southeast Asia. Asian Survey, 53(6), 1063-1086. DOI: 10.1525/as.2013.53.6.1063.
.png)
