APPLICATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN DISPUTE RESOLUTION OF TRADEMARK CRIMES IN THE POLICE (STUDY OF THE NORTH SUMATRA REGIONAL POLICE)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i2.7514Keywords:
Restorative Justice; Crime; Trademark; Police;Abstract
Restorative justice is an approach in the criminal justice system that focuses on victim recovery, perpetrator rehabilitation, and community recovery that aims to create a more holistic solution by involving all parties affected by the crime in the settlement process. The formulation of the problem in this study is how the regulation of restorative justice in the North Sumatra Regional Police, how the mechanism for resolving brand crimes in the police, and how the application of restorative justice in the North Sumatra Regional Police in brand crimes. The purpose of this study is to review and analyze the regulation of Restorative Justice in the North Sumatra Regional Police, analyze and analyze the mechanism for resolving brand crimes in the Police, and analyze and analyze the application of Restorative Justice in the North Sumatra Regional Police in Brand Crimes. This type of research uses normative juridical research that is descriptive-analytical and qualitative analysis. The results of the study explain the regulation of restorative justice in the North Sumatra Regional Police, there are various regulations such as the old Criminal Code, the Police Law, the Decree of the Chief of Police No. Pol: B / 3022 / XII / 2009 / SDEOPS concerning Handling Cases Through Alternative Dispute Resolution, Perkapolri No. 8 of 2021 concerning Handling Criminal Acts Based on Restorative Justice and Law No. 1 of 2023 concerning the National Criminal Code and Law No. 25 of 2025 concerning the New Criminal Code. Meanwhile, the mechanism for resolving trademark crimes in the police is carried out through mandatory complaints from victims and investigations by the police to resolve trademark crimes in the police. Regarding the application of restorative justice in trademark crime cases by the North Sumatra Regional Police, not a single case can be resolved using a restorative justice approach because there are key factors, namely legal, social, and cultural factors.
References
Andaria, L. (2022). Penyidikan Tindak Pidana dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. Lex Privatum, 10(4), 1–10. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/42387
Bagus, W. D. I., Ayu, W. K. P. I., & Kadek, A. S. I. (2022). Faktor-Faktor Terjadinya Tindak Pidana di Bidang Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Khususnya Merek serta Penanganan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang yang Berlaku di Indonesia. Majalah Ilmiah Universitas Tabanan, 19(1), 165–172. https://ejournal.universitastabanan.ac.id/index.php/majalah-ilmiah-untab/article/view/165
Clara, S. L., Rusmawati, D. E., & Ariani, N. D. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum Merek di Indonesia Secara Preventif dan Penegakan Represif Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 14(2), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.6679/EPH3EK78
Ernanda, A. D. (2025). Efektivitas Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Merek Terdaftar dalam Mencegah Pemalsuan dan Sengketa Kekayaan Intelektual di Indonesia. Padjadjaran Law Review, 13(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.56895/PLR.V13I1.2213
Handriyadi, S., Faniyah, I., & Fahmiron. (2025). Penghentian Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Tanpa Hak Penggunaan Merek Dagang Milik Orang Lain. Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, 9(1), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.31933/P8GAXP69
Juwita, N. (2021). Penindakan terhadap Kejahatan Hak Merek Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen dan Pemilih Hak Merek. Jurnal Ekonomi, Sosial & Humaniora, 3(2), 76–83. https://jurnalintelektiva.com/index.php/jurnal/article/view/623
Legowo, Y., Faniyah, I., & Fahmiron, F. (2021). Penegakan Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Hak Atas Merek Pelumas Kendaraan Bermotor oleh Penyidik Direktorat Reserse Kriminal Khusus Polda Sumatera Barat. UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 4(4), 492. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v5i2.212
Muhlizar, M., Akiruddin Ahmad, & Mei Rinda Kumala Dewi Br. Tarigan. (2025). Tinjauan Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Menurut Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Journal of Social and Economics Research, 7(1), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.54783/jser.v7i1.790
Ponto, F. G. (2022). Wewenang Khusus Penyidik untuk Melakukan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Paten. Lex Crimen, 11(3), 1–10. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/40776
Radjak, F., Lahaling, H., & Beddu, S. (2024). Merek UMKM, Aset Bangsa: Langkah Tegas Pemerintah Memperkuat Perlindungan Hukum. Jurnal Litigasi Amsir, 179–187. https://journalstih.amsir.ac.id/index.php/julia/article/view/614
Ramadhan, M. C., Zulyadi, R., Khadijah, S. N., & Pinem, J. P. (2022). Faktor Penghambat Penegakan Hukum Merek di Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 9(2), 192–199. https://doi.org/10.31289/jiph.v9i2.7155
Razma, F. N., Saidin, Sembiring, R., & Leviza, J. (2024). Analisis Akibat Hukum terhadap Dua Putusan yang Berbeda dalam Sengketa Merek antara “MS Glow” dan “PS Glow/Pstore Glow”: Studi Putusan Nomor 2/Pdt.Sus.Hki/Merek/2022/PN. Niaga Mdn Dan Putusan Nomor 2/Pdt.Sus.Hki/Merek/2022/PN. Niaga Sby. Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA), 2(6), 3031–5220. https://doi.org/10.62281/V2I6.348
Rizki, R., Depari, D. S. B., & Kurniawan, I. D. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Putusan Nomor 34/Pdt.Sus Hki/Merek/2021/Pn Jkt.Pst tentang Sengketa Merek Yunteng. Jurnal Rectum: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana, 5(3), 273. https://doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v5i3.3553
Santyaningtyas, A., Atikah, W., & Kerin Setyawan, A. R. (2023). Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemilik Merek dalam Menyelesaikan Penjual Barang Palsu Atas Perdagangan Merek Terkenal Melalui Tiktok Live. Iblam Law Review, 3(3), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v3i3.184
Sinaga, J., Sitorus, R., Ginting, S. Br., & Tobing, C. N. M. (2024). Delik Aduan dalam Penegakan Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Merek Berdasarkan Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 5(2), 458–464. https://doi.org/10.55357/IS.V5I2.637
Sinaga, N. A. (2020). Pelanggaran Hak Merek yang Dilakukan Pelaku Usaha dalam Perdagangan Melalui Transaksi Elektronik (E-Commerce). Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 10(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v10i2.463
Sukmawan, Y. A., & Damayanti, D. (2025). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris sebagai Strategi Penguatan Perspektif Kajian Ilmu Hukum. Notary Law Journal, 4(3), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.32801/NOLAJ.V4I3.116
Susanti, E., Sya’bania, D. N., & Amrullah, R. (2023). Aplikasi Kebijakan Merek Dagang Palsu dan Problematikanya. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 3(2), 251–261. https://ejournal.penerbitjurnal.com/index.php/socialscience/article/view/173
Telaumbanua, S. (2022). Penegakan Hukum Pidana terhadap Pelanggaran Merek Terdaftar “Lois” yang Memiliki Persamaan pada Pokoknya (Studi Putusan Nomor 138/Pid.B/2018/Pn.Pkl). Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 3(2), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.55357/IS.V3I2.213
Widiantoro, R. F. (2022). Pendaftaran Merek Sebagai Sarana Perlindungan Hukum. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 7(2), 416–426. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol7.iss2.art14
Wilyamson, & Benni, B. (2025). Akibat Hukum terhadap Barang Bukti Perkara Tindak Pidana yang Eksekusi Pengembaliannya Ditolak oleh Pemilik Atau yang Berhak. Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review, 4(2), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.31933/V6WDK062
.png)
