INDONESIAN LANGUAGE EDUCATION BASED ON LEARNING OUTCOMES IN THE TEACHING MATERIALS DEVELOPMENT COURSE AT THE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF NORTH SUMATRA

Rita Rita; Ali Ali; Ratna Soraya; Rika Kartika

doi:10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i1.7409

Authors

Rita Rita Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
Ali Ali Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
Ratna Soraya Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
Rika Kartika Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i1.7409

Keywords:

Indonesian Language Education, learning outcomes, development of teaching materials, OBE-based learning, higher education

Abstract

This study aims to describe Indonesian language education based on learning outcomes in the Teaching Material Development course at the Islamic University of North Sumatra. This study uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive type of research. Data was collected through in-depth interviews, learning observations, and documentation studies, then analyzed using an interactive analysis model. The results of the study show that the formulation of learning outcomes has referred to the learning outcomes of graduates, but some of the formulations are still general and have not been fully measured. The implementation of learning has implemented an active learning strategy, but the relationship between learning activities and learning outcomes has not been fully understood by students. The development of Indonesian teaching materials shows a systematic structure, but learning evaluation is still predominantly oriented towards the knowledge aspect. This study concludes that it is necessary to strengthen the alignment between learning outcomes, learning strategies, and evaluation systems to improve the quality of Indonesian learning in higher education.

References

Agustina, E. S. (2023). paradigma pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia dalam kurikulum Merdeka. Seminar Nasional Literasi Prodi PBSI FPBS UPGRIS, 888–907.

Anisa, S. J., & Abdillah, L. A. (2026). Integrasi Literasi Teknologi Informasi melalui Pengembangan Modul Ajar Digital Interaktif Berbasis Canva dan Heyzine dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di Sekolah Dasar Negeri 238 Palembang. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Bangsa, 3(11), 6344–6350.

Belshaw, C. (2020). The value and meaning of life. Routledge.

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Train-the-trainers: Implementing outcomes-based teaching and learning in Malaysian higher education. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 8, 1–19.

Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative (Vol. 7). Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Gorys Keraf, D. (2009). Diksi dan gaya bahasa. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Joyce, B., & Calhoun, E. (2024). Models of teaching. Routledge.

Masgumelar, N. K., & Mustafa, P. S. (2021). Teori belajar konstruktivisme dan implikasinya dalam pendidikan dan pembelajaran. GHAITSA: Islamic Education Journal, 2(1), 49–57.

Massaguni, M. (n.d.). KETERAMPILAN MENULIS AKADEMIK: Teori, Praktik, dan Publikasi. wawasan Ilmu.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1992). Analisis data kualitatif. Jakarta: UI press.

Moleong, L. J. (n.d.). Metodologi penelitian.

Mulyasa, H. E. (2021). Menjadi guru penggerak merdeka belajar. Bumi Aksara.

Muzakir, M. I. (2023). Implementasi kurikulum outcome based education (Obe) dalam sistem pendidikan tinggi di era revolusi industri 4.0. Edukasiana: Journal of Islamic Education, 2(1), 118–139.

Nurgiantoro, B. (2018). Penilaian otentik dalam pembelajaran bahasa. UGM PRESS.

Prihatiningsih, T. S. (2023). Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi (Capaian Pembelajaran) untuk Pendidikan Kedokteran dan Profesi Kesehatan: Implikasi Kebijakan dan Tantangan Implementasi. UGM PRESS.

Purwati, P. D. (2024). Buku Ajar Mata Kuliah Pengembangan Pembelajaran Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. Cahya Ghani Recovery.

Ramansyah, W. (2013). Pengembangan bahan ajar mata kuliah strategi pembelajaran untuk mahasiswa pendidikan guru sekolah dasar. Widyagogik: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar, 1(1), 17–27.

Sastradinata, B. L. N. (2023). Transformasi mindset dalam membangun kemampuan berpikir kritis melalui metode pembelajaran aktif. Deepublish.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. CV. Alfabeta.

Urgo, K., Arguello, J., & Capra, R. (2019). Anderson and krathwohl’s two-dimensional taxonomy applied to task creation and learning assessment. Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval, 117–124.

Widodo, D. P., Judijanto, L., Riska, F. M., Febriyanti, R., & Karuru, P. (2025). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Wilson, L. O. (2016). Anderson and Krathwohl Bloom’s taxonomy revised understanding the new version of Bloom’s taxonomy. The Second Principle, 1(1), 1–8.