Strategic Communication and Religious Tolerance in Multicultural Societies: A Bibliometric Review from Scopus Database

Authors

  • Mu'min Syaifuddin UNPAD
  • Toto Sugito Universitas Padjajaran, Indonesia
  • Meria Octavianti Universitas Padjajaran, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i1.7267

Keywords:

Strtegic Communication; Relegious; Tolerance; Multicultural Societies

Abstract

Religious tolerance is essential for sustaining social cohesion in multicultural societies shaped by globalization and digital communication. Strategic communication contributes to inclusive narratives and interfaith understanding, yet research integrating these domains remains fragmented. This study systematically maps the intellectual structure, research trends, and gaps in strategic communication and religious tolerance scholarship using a bibliometric approach. A descriptive quantitative analysis examined 290 Scopus-indexed publications published between 1985 and 2025. Citation analysis, co-authorship mapping, and keyword co-occurrence were applied to identify dominant themes, influential contributors, and knowledge structures. The findings indicate a highly centralized research landscape dominated by Western countries, particularly the United States and Australia. Public relations emerges as the principal conceptual framework linking organizational, community, and institutional communication, while religious tolerance is often treated implicitly rather than as a core analytical concept. The study reveals limited representation of non-Western contexts, highlighting a significant research gap and opportunities for more inclusive).

References

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Botan, C. H. (2021). The Handbook of Strategic Communication. Wiley-Blackwell.

Bridges, D. R., Davidson, R. A., Odegard, P. S., & Tomkowiak, J. (2011). Interprofessional collaboration: Three best practice models of interprofessional education. Medical Education Online, 16, 6035. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v16i0.6035

Connaughton, S. L., & Pukallus, S. (2024). The Routledge Handbook of Conflict and Peace Communication. Routledge.

Djupe, P. A. (2022). The Religious Communication Approach and Political Communication. Political Psychology, 43(5), 889–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12848

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342.

Galbraith, Q. (2020). Religion as a Source of Tolerance and Intolerance. Brigham Young University ScholarsArchive. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6807&context=facpub

Grigoropoulou, N. (2020). Discussing God: The Effect of (Ir)Religious Identities on Topic-Sentiment Polarization in Online Debates. Review of Religious Research, 62(3), 485–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-020-00425-y

Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M., Salvador-Olivares, M., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2024). A bibliometric review of communication and religious tolerance research: Mapping intellectual structures and emerging trends. Scientometrics, 129(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04835-2

Kemp, D. (2013). Community relations and mining: Core to business but not “core business.” Resources Policy, 38(4), 523–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.08.003

Montazeri, A., Mohammadi, S., M.Hesari, P., Ghaemi, M., Riazi, H., & Sheikhi-Mobarakeh, Z. (2023). Preliminary guideline for reporting bibliometric reviews of the biomedical literature (BIBLIO): a minimum requirements. Systematic Reviews, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02410-2

Öztürk, O., Kocaman, R., & Kanbach, D. K. (2024). How to design bibliometric research: an overview and a framework proposal. Review of Managerial Science, 18(11), 3333–3361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00738-0

Parsons, R. (2014). Maintaining legitimacy of a contested practice: How the minerals industry understands its social licence to operate. Resources Policy, 41, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.02.002

Sembiring, A. Z. B. (2024). Persuasive Communication Strategies of Religious Extension Workers in Maintaining Religious Tolerance Between Communities in Berastagi District. JISI: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Indonesia, 5(1).

Verkuyten, M. (2018). Intergroup Toleration and Its Implications for Culturally Diverse Societies. Social Issues and Policy Review, 12(1), 218–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12045

Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

Downloads

Published

2026-01-31

How to Cite

Syaifuddin, M., Toto Sugito, & Meria Octavianti. (2026). Strategic Communication and Religious Tolerance in Multicultural Societies: A Bibliometric Review from Scopus Database. SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL, 15(1), 475–485. https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i1.7267