EVALUATION AND OPTIMIZATION OF NATURAL LIGHTING ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF THE LAMPUNG HAPKIDO MARTIAL ARTS ROOM AT BTC (BAGOES TRAINING CENTER) GYM SEPUTIH RAMAN
EVALUASI DAN OPTIMALISASI PENCAHAYAAN ALAMI PADA LANTAI DUA RUANG BELADIRI HAPKIDO LAMPUNG DI BTC (BAGOES TRAINING CENTER) GYM SEPUTIH RAMAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v14i4.6712Keywords:
Natural Lighting, SNI 03-2396-2001, TUU and TUS, DIALux Evo Simulation, Lighting StandardsAbstract
The light source that comes from sunlight entering directly into the room, especially in the morning and afternoon, is called natural lighting. SNI 03-2396-2001 states that ideal natural lighting during the day, from 08:00 to 16:00 WIB, should provide evenly distributed light throughout the room without causing glare. The standard illumination for martial arts training rooms ranges from 300 lux (minimum), 350 lux (medium), and 500 lux (maximum). The aim of the research is to evaluate and optimize natural lighting in sports spaces, particularly the Hapkido room on the second floor of the BTC (Bagoes Training Center) Gym in Seputih Raman, Lampung. The quality, orientation of window openings, and the distribution of light entering the building through windows are important factors in utilizing natural lighting. With larger window sizes, there is a need to control the amount of light entering the room. A quantitative method is used in this research. Data is collected through observation, literature review, light intensity measurements in the field, and simulations of current conditions using DIALux Evo. Data analysis uses mathematical formulas. The results show that lighting at BTC (Bagoes Training Center) Gym lacks light intensity and does not meet the standard. As a result, athletes feel less comfortable during training. At BTC Gym, lighting intensity has been adjusted to meet the lighting standards through several changes, such as lowering glass reflectance, altering window sizes, changing the type of window glass, and reducing sun shading. The lighting level has been improved, and the room now meets the SNI 03-2396-2001 standard. The Daylight Factor should be between 2% and 5%, with TUU between 0.5 and 0.8, and TUS between 0.3 and 0.5. A Daylight Factor above 10% can cause glare, uneven light distribution, and excessive heating, which requires design modifications to ensure optimal natural lighting.
References
[1] Agrippina Fleta. (2021). Analisis Pencahayaan Alami dan Buatan pada Ruang Kantor Terhadap Kenyamanan Visual Pengguna. Vol. 3 No 1.
[2] Agus Pramono, dkk. (2023). Analisis Intensitas Penerangan pada Laboratorium Komputer Universitas AMIKOM Purwokerto. Jurnal SIMETRIS, 14(1).
[3] Amping, L. S. E., Ratu, R. A., & Ruru, D. A. (2021). Distribusi Pencahayaan Alami pada Gedung Olahraga. Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Arsitektur, 12(2), 75–83.
[4] Bean. (2004). Teknik Optimasi Pencahayaan Alami dalam Interior Rumah Tinggal. Universitas Kristen Petra, Surabaya.
[5] Husni Kuruseng, & Muhammad Ramli Rahim. (2016). Penentuan Jenis Kondisi Luminansi Langit dengan Rasio Awan dan Data Lama Penyinaran Matahari di Makassar. Jurnal JPE, 20(1).
[6] Ibrahim, N. H., Hashim, N. M., & Yusof, Z. M. (2022). Assessment of Natural Lighting and Visual Comfort in Indoor Sports Facilities. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 40(5), 987–1002. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-03-2022-0038
[7] Ikhsanty, N. (2023). Evaluasi Sistem Pencahayaan pada Ruangan Olahraga di Gedung Futsal OEPOI Menggunakan DIALux Evo 8.2 [Skripsi]. Universitas Nusa Cendana.
[8] Kischkoweit-Lopin, M. (2002). An Overview of Daylighting Systems. Solar Energy, 73(2), 77-82.
[9] Lechner, N. (2000). Heating, Cooling and Lighting: Design Methods for Architects. Wiley, New York.
[10] Lechner, N. (2007). Heating, Cooling, Lighting: Metode Desain untuk Arsitektur Edisi 2 (Terjemahan Sandriana Siti). PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
[11] Listiana Cahyantari. (2016). Analisis Intensitas Pencahayaan di Ruang Kuliah Gedung Fisika Universitas Jember dengan Menggunakan Calculux Indoor 5.0 b. Universitas Jember, Jawa Timur.
[12] Liu, B., Chen, X., & Lin, Z. (2023). A Study on Daylighting Metrics Related to the Subjective Evaluation of Daylight and Visual Comfort of Students in China. Building and Environment, 244, 110750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110750
[13] Matusiak, B. S., & Houser, K. W. (2023). Daylight and Lighting Quality in Architecture: A Review of Metrics and Methods. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 18(2), 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/ctad130
[14] Mujib, F. K., & Rahmadiansah, A. (2012). Desain Pencahayaan Lapangan Bulu Tangkis Indoor ITS. Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November, Surabaya.
[15] Olotuah, A. O., & Adeniji, A. O. (2020). Daylighting and Energy Efficiency in Public Buildings in Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Studies, 8(1), 41–52.
[16] Osterhaus, W. K. (2005). Discomfort Glare Assessment and Prevention for Daylight Applications in Office Environments. Solar Energy, 79(2), 140-158.
[17] Rachmawati, F., & Siahaan, A. (2021). Evaluasi Intensitas Pencahayaan Alami terhadap Standar SNI 03-2396-2001 pada Bangunan Pendidikan. RISA: Jurnal Riset Arsitektur, 5(3), 112–121.
[18] Rea, M. S. The IESNA Lighting Handbook Reference and Application.
Reinhart, C. F., & Wienold, J. (2011). The Daylighting Dashboard - A Simulation-Based Design Analysis for Daylit Spaces. Building and Environment, 46(2), 386-396.
[19] Seline Adella, & Mira Dewi Pangestu. (2021). Efektivitas Daylight Mirror Shaft Sebagai Sistem Pencahayaan Alami Ruang Bawah Tanah pada Langit Tropis. Jurnal Arsitektur, 7(2). Universitas Katolik Parahyangan.
[20] Syarif, M. Ibnan, dkk. (2018). Fungsi Iluminasi pada Naskah Jawa Skriptorium Keraton. Jurnal Imajinasi, 12(2). Universitas Negeri Semarang.
[21] Van Den Whmelenberg, K., Inanici, M., & Johnson, P. (2010). The Effect of Luminance Distribution Patterns on Occupant Preference in a Daylight Office Environment. Leukos, 7(2), 102-122.
.png)
