DETAILED LAND REGISTRATION MECHANISM AND ITS LEGALITY IN MAKASSAR CITY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE HISTORICAL SCHOOL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v14i4.6305Keywords:
Rincik, Land Registration, HistoricalAbstract
This study examines the legal validity of landholding based on rincik within Indonesia’s land law architecture and the registration mechanism in Makassar from a historical school perspective. The objectives are to map the status of rincik as an old title record, to explain administrative conversion toward land certificates via sporadic registration and PTSL, and to test the evidentiary space of rincik in civil disputes. The method is normative legal research using statutory and historical approaches, reinforced by dogmatic interpretation, hermeneutic reading, and field inquiry with land officials. The legal frame covers UUPA Article 19 and Government Regulation 24 of 1997 Articles 23, 24 paragraph 2, 26, and 32 paragraph 1, as well as ATR BPN Regulation 6 of 2018 and Presidential Instruction 2 of 2018. Findings position rincik as preliminary juridical data with conditional probative value that may be recognized when authenticity is proven, long term possession exceeding twenty years is shown, credible witnesses are presented, fiscal duties are evidenced, and spatial consistency with surveys is demonstrated. The registration mechanism covers application submission, juridical verification, physical survey, thirty day public announcement, rights determination, and certificate issuance. Jurisprudence from Makassar in Andi Baso Matutu confirms a corridor for non certificate documents, where a verified rincik supported by possession, witnesses, and data integrity may culminate in a final and binding judgment and execution. The results affirm the certificate as the strongest title while recognizing rincik as an evidentiary gateway and a basis for conversion toward certification through PTSL.
References
Arum Mei Sari, & Edy Lisdiyono. (2024). Perlindungan hukum bagi penghadap terhadap permasalahan akta jual beli tanah oleh PPAT (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Semarang Nomor: 676/PID.B/2016/PN.SMG). Jurnal Akta Notaris, 3(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.56444/aktanotaris.v3i1.1752
Antonio Tilman, Dian Aries Mujiburohman, & Asih Retno Dewi. (2021). Legalisasi tanah kasultanan dan tanah kadipaten di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Riau Law Journal, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v5i1.7852
Dewi Rachmawati. (2021). Kepastian hukum terhadap tanda bukti kepemilikan hak atas tanah. Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 6(6), 2700. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v6i6.3038
Heril, Andi Suriyaman M Pide, & Sri Susyanti Nur. (2022). Perlindungan hukum terhadap tanah adat suku Bugis/Tolotang di Kabupaten Sidenreng Rappang. Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.51825/sjp.v1i2.
Ahmar Bayu Wijaya, Nurdin, & Hambali Husaini. (2024). Penyelesaian sengketa secara non-litigasi terhadap sertipikat hak milik (SHM) dan surat rincik (Studi Kasus Wilayah Kecamatan Tanralili Kabupaten Maros). Kajian Eksekusi Madani Law Journal, 1(3), 331–343.
Lailesya Triyono, Zulkifli Makkawaru, & Andi Tira. (2024). Penguasaan hak atas tanah berdasarkan sertipikat sementara. Clavia: Journal of Law, 22(3), 426–437.
Sumardjono, M. S. W. (2018). Kebijakan pertanahan antara regulasi dan implementasi. Jakarta: Kompas.
Grimm, J. (1828). Deutsche Rechtsalterthümer. Göttingen: Dieterichsche Buchhandlung.
Wieacker, F. (1995). A History of Private Law in Europe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Harsono, B. (2008). Hukum Agraria Indonesia: Sejarah Pembentukan UUPA, Isi, dan Pelaksanaannya. Jakarta: Djambatan.
Arizona, Y. (2012). Pluralisme hukum dalam pengakuan hak masyarakat adat atas tanah. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 19(4), 590–609.
Supriadi. (2020). Hukum Agraria. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Santoso, U. (2012). Pendaftaran dan Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah. Jakarta: Kencana.
Grimm, J. (1965). Deutsche Rechtsalterthümer (edisi revisi). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
.png)
