LEARNING MEDIA THAT IMPROVE SOLAR SYSTEM LEARNING OUTCOMES

Linda Susanti; I Nyoman Sudana Degeng; Nurmida Catherine Sitompul

doi:10.36526/sosioedukasi.v14i4.6304

Authors

Linda Susanti Magister Teknologi Pendidikan, Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya, Indonesia
I Nyoman Sudana Degeng Departemen Teknologi Pendidikan, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
Nurmida Catherine Sitompul Magister Teknologi Pendidikan, Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v14i4.6304

Keywords:

E-Book, Solar System, Video

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the differences in learning outcomes between students using video and those using e-books, as well as the impact of learning motivation on understanding the Solar System material. The research design employs a quasi-experimental approach involving 42 sixth-grade students from SD Negeri Rejosopinggir. The results indicate that the use of video significantly enhances students' learning outcomes, with an average posttest score of 82.9 compared to 78.3 for the e-book group. Additionally, students with high motivation show a greater score increase. These findings suggest that learning media should be tailored to students' motivation levels to achieve optimal learning outcomes.

References

Afifa, K., & Astuti, T. (2024). The effect of digital learning media on motivation and learning outcomes of IPAS. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(6), 3155–3165.

Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 275–288.

Kikas, E. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions and misconceptions concerning three natural phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 432–448.

Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge university press.

Nadeak, B., & Naibaho, L. (2020). VIDEO-BASED LEARNING ON IMPROVING STUDENTS’LEARNING OUTPUT. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(2), 44–54.

Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Harris, N. R., Sanders, T., Parker, P., del Pozo Cruz, B., & Lonsdale, C. (2022). Multimedia design for learning: An overview of reviews with meta-meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 92(3), 413–454.

Panjaitan, M. B., Alamsyah, M., Siburian, M. F., Fatmawati, E., Uslan, U., & Siagian, G. (2023). Improving students’ learning outcomes in natural science subject for third grade of elementary school through video media. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(3), 3253–3266.

Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2014). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. (No Title).

Suciani, N. K., Sudarma, I. K., & Bayu, G. W. (2022). The impact of learning style and learning motivation on students’ science learning outcomes. Mimbar PGSD Undiksha, 10(2), 395–401.

Sutiarti, T., Evayenny, E., & Hasanah, N. (2023). The Relationship Between Using Video Learning Media and Science Learning Outcomes. Proceeding of International Conference on Education, 2, 431–439.

Treagust, D. F., & Duit, R. (2008). Conceptual change: A discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical challenges for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(2), 297–328.

Wabiser, Y. D., Prabawa, T. S., & Rupidara, N. S. (2022). The Exploration of Elementary School Students’ Learning Motivation: A Case Study in Papua. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (EJER), 97.

Zafeer, H. M. I., Maqbool, S., Rong, Y., & Maqbool, S. (2025). Impact of digital learning tools on student’s engagement and achievement in middle school science classes. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 9(2), 177–196.