ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES FOR MAKING FAMILY CARDS (KK) AT THE POPULATION AND CIVIL REGISTRATION OFFICE (DISDUKCAPIL) OF GAYO LUES REGENCY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v14i1.5710Keywords:
Quality; Public Services; Family Card.Abstract
This study analyzes the quality of Family Card (KK) issuance services at the Population and Civil Registration Office (Disdukcapil) of Gayo Lues Regency. Using a qualitative method with a descriptive approach, this study identifies the primary obstacles to services, including network disruptions, power outages, limited service personnel, and a lack of supporting facilities. Although the KK issuance procedure is promised to be completed within one working day, various external and internal factors cause service delays. Based on Zeithaml's theory of service quality, it was found that aspects of reliability, physical evidence, and Responsiveness still require improvement. To overcome these obstacles, Disdukcapil needs to improve its technological infrastructure, increase the number of service personnel, and provide better supporting facilities for the community. Periodic training for officers is also required to enhance professionalism and Responsiveness in delivering services. In addition, collaboration with the central government in strengthening the population administration system is a strategic step to ensure more effective, transparent, and accountable services. This research is expected to serve as a reference for efforts to improve public services in the field of population administration.
References
Andriani, V., Lubis, Y., & Ritonga, S. (2023). Analysis of the Quality of Family Card Services in Timbang Deli Village, Medan Amplas District, Medan City. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences (JEHSS), 5(3), 1869–1880. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v5i3.1437
Angkat, K. M., Kadir, A., & Isnaini, I. (2017). Analysis of Population Administration Services at the Population and Civil Registration Office of Dairi Regency. Journal of Public Administration, 7(1), 33–48.
Anyar, H. A., and others. (2018). Implementation of Child Legalization and Registration Based on Law No. 24 of 2013 concerning Amendments to Law No. 23 of 2006 concerning Population Administration (case study of the Tanjungbalai City Population and Civil Registration Office).
Dharmanu, I. P., & Wijaya, K. A. S. (2019). Public Perception of Service Performance in the Program to Accelerate the Improvement of Coverage of Population Document Ownership in Klungkung Regency. Public Administration Journal, 9(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.31289/jap.v9i1.2209
Heldi. (n.d.). Implementation of Law Number 25 of 2009 concerning Public Services in Cicalengka District, Bandung Regency in 2019. Journal of Dialectics: Journal of Social Sciences, 19(2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.54783/dialektika.v19i2.10
HUTASOIT, P. L. (2024). Legal Analysis Of The Quality Of Employee Performance In Population Administration Services Based On Law Number 24 Of 2013 Concerning Population Administration (Study On The Creation Of E-Ktp At The East Medan Sub-District Office, Medan City).
Indonesia, R. (2009). Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 25 of 2009 concerning Public Services. Bphn.Go—id, 2003(1), 3.
Maftuchah, U., Aisyah, D., Science, P., Public, A., & North, U. S. (2024). Quality of Population Administration Services in Family Card Management at the Population and Civil Registration Office of Deli Serdang Regency. And Civil Registration of Deli Serdang Regency, 4, 6811–6827.
Manik, N., Adam, A., & Isnaini, I. (2022). Community Participation in Development Planning Deliberation in Padang Bolak District. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences (JEHSS), 5(1), 675–684. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v5i1.1274
Megawati. (2018). Quality of Service at the Serang City Population and Civil Registration Office in 2018. Quality of Service at the Serang City Population and Civil Registration Office in 2018, 232.
Office, S. (2019). Evaluation of Electronic Identity Card Service Procedures at the Sub-district Office. 6(2), 88–97.
Pahriya refused. (2019). Quality of Family Card Making Services at the Balangan Regency Population and Civil Registration Office. In the Thesis at the Amuntai College of Administrative Sciences (STIA). Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences.
Rahmadanik, D. (2021). Implementation of Population Administration Services at the Population and Civil Registration Office of Sidoarjo Regency in the Covid-19 Pandemic Era. Governance Dynamics: Journal of State Administration Sciences, 11(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.33005/jdg.v11i1.2480
Reza, M. (2024). Quality of Public Services in Making Family Cards (Family Cards. At the Population Office.
Ririn Yulianti, Yani Hendayaningsih, & Yesi Nur Asyah. (2022). Quality Of Public Services For Making Family Cards In Providing Population Administration Rights To The Community (Study at the Cidolog District Office, Ciamis Regency). Moderate: Scientific Journal of Government Science, 8(4), 672–682. https://doi.org/10.25157/moderat.v8i4.2862
Simbolon, N. R. B., Marlon Sihombing, K., H., & Isnaini. (2020). Implementation of the Indonesian Healthy Card Program. Structuring: Scientific Journal of the Master of Public Administration, 1(2), 147–155.
Siregar, A. F., Siregar, N. S. S., & Lubis, M. S. (2022). Strategy to Improve Public Service Performance in the Management of Business Licenses and Building Permits at the Fifty Sepuluh Sub-district Office, Batu Bara Regency. Perspectives, 11(2), 476–492. https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v11i2.5853
Tjiptono, F., & Chandra, G. (2016). Service, quality, and satisfaction. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Tuju, M. A. M., Kimbal, M., & Mantiri, M. (2017). Quality of Population Administration Services of the Population and Civil Registration Office of South Minahasa Regency (A Study on Birth Certificate Services). EXECUTIVE JOURNAL, 2(2).
Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuram, A. (1990). Delivering quality service: balancing customer perceptions and expectations. In Choice Reviews Online (Vol. 28, Issue 01). The Free Press. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.28-0390