ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN SPATIAL REASONING, VISUALISASI, DAN REPRESENTASI MATEMATIS PADA PENYELESAIAN SOAL GEOMETRI RUANG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36526/tr.v10i1.7674Keywords:
mathematical representation, spatial reasoning, three-dimensional space geometry, visualizationAbstract
This study aims to describe the spatial reasoning, visualization, and mathematical representation abilities of Mathematics Education students in solving two spatial geometry problems. The study used a mix method with a descriptive approach. The subjects were 19 students from the class of 2025. Data collection was carried out by a test using two questions. The first question relates to determining the shortest path on the surface of a cube through unfolding, while the second question relates to determining the distance from a point to a plane on the cube. Subjects’ answers were categorized into four quality levels: category A (correct and complete answer), B (initial model is correct but incomplete), C (major strategy or representation error), and D (strategy cannot be operationally formalized). The data show that 9 subjects fell into category B, 9 subjects fell into category C, and 1 subject fell into category D. In the first question, the average subject had a moderate level of spatial reasoning and representation, with visualizations already quite apparent. Subjects tended to be able to construct mathematical visualizations and representations, although some had not yet provided a complete minimum justification. In the second question, the average subject had a low level of spatial reasoning and representation, with visualizations beginning to appear but lacking operational capabilities. Subjects experienced more fundamental difficulties, particularly in constructing planes, determining relevant distances, and formalizing relationships between lines. These results point to the need to emphasize representation translation, mathematical modeling, and argument validation in geometry learning.
References
Adnan, S., Juniati, D., & Sulaiman, R. (2019). Students’ Mathematical Representation in Geometry Problem Solving Based on Sex Differences. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 2(4), 184–187. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v2i4.94
Amalia, A. K., & Amir, M. F. (2024). Spatial Reasoning of Students with Mathematical Learning Difficulties. Journal of Medives: Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 8(2), 256. https://doi.org/10.31331/medivesveteran.v8i2.3160
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design-Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Desai, S., Bush, S. B., & Safi, F. (2021). Mathematical Representations in the Teaching and Learning of Geometry: A Review of the Literature from the United States. In Electronic Journal For Research In Science & Mathematics Education (Vol. 25, Number 4).
Evidiasari, S., Subanji, S., & Irawati, S. (2019). Students’ Spatial Reasoning in Solving Geometrical Transformation Problems. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v1i2.8703
Fudin, M. I., Cahyono, H., Rizky, O., & Putri, U. (2022). Analysis of the Visual to Verbal Mathematical Representation Process for Junior High School Students in Solving HOTS Questions in terms of Adversity Quotient. In Mathematics Education Journals (Vol. 6, Number 2). Online. http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/MEJ
Fujita, T., Kondo, Y., Kumakura, H., Kunimune, S., & Jones, K. (2020). Spatial reasoning skills about 2D representations of 3D geometrical shapes in grades 4 to 9. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 32(2), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00335-w
Harris, D. (2023). Spatial reasoning in context: bridging cognitive and educational perspectives of spatial-mathematics relations. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 8). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1302099
Harris, D., Logan, T., & Lowrie, T. (2021). Unpacking mathematical-spatial relations: Problem-solving in static and interactive tasks. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33(3), 495–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00316-z
Hidayati, D. W., & Wahyuni, A. (2021). Analysis of Mathematical Representation Ability Based on Level of Reading Interest in Geometry Course. Journal of Medives : Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 5(2), 271. https://doi.org/10.31331/medivesveteran.v5i2.1671
Loeb, S., Dynarski, S., McFarland, D., Morris, P., Reardon, S., & Reber, S. (2017). De-scriptive analysis in education: A guide for researchers. The National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE) conducts unbiased, large-scale evaluations of education programs and practices. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/.
Mulligan, J., Woolcott, G., Mitchelmore, M., & Davis, B. (2018). Connecting mathematics learning through spatial reasoning. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 30(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0210-x
Prawira, K. Q. A., Dahlan, J. A., & Purniati, T. (2023). Pemerian Kecakapan Representasi Matematis Siswa SMP dalam materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. Tatar Pasundan: Jurnal Diklat Keagamaan, 17(1), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.38075/tp.v17i1.319
Prayitno, L. L., Purwanto, P., Subanji, S., Susiswo, S., & As’ari, A. R. (2020). Exploring students' representation process in solving ill-structured problems geometry. Participatory Educational Research, 7(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.17275/PER.20.28.7.2
Schoenherr, J., & Schukajlow, S. (2024). Characterizing external visualization in mathematics education research: a scoping review. ZDM - Mathematics Educa-tion, 56(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01494-3
Žakelj, A., & Klančar, A. (2022). The Role of Visual Representations in Geometry Learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1393–1411. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1393
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Adhi Surya Nugraha

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





